A Comparison of Sequential Compression Devices and Foot Pumps in the Obstetric Population

July 20, 2017 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Study of Patient Compliance and Comfort Using Sequential Compression Devices and Foot Pumps for DVT Prevention

The researchers at Johns Hopkins University believe that the foot pump will be superior to sequential compression devices in comfort and patient compliance which may increase provider efforts to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in pregnancy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will be comparing sequential compression devices (SCDs) to foot pumps to determine if foot pumps will be better tolerated by obstetric patients, both antepartum and intrapartum. Patients in whom thromboembolic prophylaxis is deemed necessary and ordered by the treating physician, who agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to receive SCDs or the foot pump as part of their thromboembolic prophylaxis regimen. The investigators will administer a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction and comfort with each device and they will be asked to complete a log of hours they wore their assigned device for a 7 day period (or as long as they are prescribed). Random spot checks to verify compliance will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Bedrest
  • Thrombophilia
  • Prescribed DVT prophylaxis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active DVT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Patients will have the Kendall, A-V foot impulse pump, model 6060 applied to their lower extremities to prevent DVT
Will wear device for DVT prevention and receive questionnaire about compliance and comfort. Will also undergo random checks to confirm compliance with instructions and use
Active Comparator: 2
Patients will have the Kendall,sequential compression device, model 9525 applied to the lower extremities to prevent DVT
Will wear device for DVT prevention and receive questionnaire about compliance and comfort. Will also undergo random checks to confirm compliance with instructions and use

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort Level
Time Frame: once during first 7 days of hospitalization
Scale of 1-10 (1 being very uncomfortable and 10 being very uncomfortable) describing level of comfort during the time of device use (composite score of heat, softness, discomfort).
once during first 7 days of hospitalization
Patient Compliance
Time Frame: for 1-7 days during hospitalization
Nurse conducting random checks throughout hospital stay and events of noncompliance will be recorded
for 1-7 days during hospitalization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DVT Prevention
Time Frame: up to 3 months
positive DVT on ultrasound
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abimbola Aina, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • foot pump vs SCD

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe