Automatic External Defibrillation Monitoring in Cardiac Arrest

June 22, 2015 updated by: A. Maziar Zafari, Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Inc.

We propose to randomize automatic external cardioverter/defibrillators (AECD) in patients who are at high risk for life-threatening abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias) and are admitted to the telemetry ward, all other treatments being constant including cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

We hypothesize that the automatic, rapid, accurate and specific diagnostic and therapeutic technology used in AECDs will further increase the rate of survival in patients with cardiac arrest through rapid and automatic defibrillation, independent of operator initiation, as compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiated by healthcare providers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest (CA) is defined as the sudden cessation of effective cardiac pumping function as a result of either ventricular asystole (inactivity of the heart) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). Pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation is an abnormal electrical activity of the ventricles of the heart. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are essential because first, more than a few minutes of total CA results in permanent damage to the brain due to lack of oxygen, and second, the success of resuscitative measures is related to the rapidity with which they are instituted following arrest. For a person in VT/VF the probability of successful defibrillation and subsequent survival to hospital discharge is directly and negatively related to the interval between onset of VT/VF and delivery of first shock.

Comparison: By using AECDs we will evaluate if an automatic, rapid, accurate and specific diagnostic technology will further increase the rate of survival in patients with VT/VF by rapid and automatic defibrillation, independent of operator initiation, as compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with conventional defibrillators initiated by healthcare providers. This trial will be a randomized, controlled trial and will test if AECDs can improve outcome measures when compared to traditional responses.

Conventional defibrillators are manually operated defibrillators that have to be attached to the patient and operated by a healthcare provider or layperson. In contrast, the purpose of AECDs is to automatically detect life-threatening arrhythmias and deliver external shocks according to a programmable prescription for hospitalized patients, who may be at transient risk for the development of life-threatening arrhythmias. AECDs immediately and automatically monitor, detect and treat cardiac arrhythmias with no human intervention. The AECD proposed to be utilized in this trial, PowerHeart CRM, a product of Cardiac Science, Inc, has been evaluated in the hospital setting to assess safety and efficacy, and has been approved by the FDA to be prophylactically attached to hospital patients and provide automatic defibrillation therapy without human intervention.

All patients admitted to the telemetry unit will be asked to volunteer for this study. Up to 3,000 patients will be asked to volunteer in this study during their stay in the telemetry unit. This study will evaluate if there is a way to improve survival in CA by comparing two groups

Group 1: This group includes patients admitted to telemetry unit who will undergo standard measures of CPR in case cardiac arrest is suspected.

Group 2: This group includes patients admitted to telemetry unit who will have an AECD attached to the chest wall and who will also undergo standard measures of CPR in case of cardiac arrest.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Atlanta Veterans Adminstration Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted to telemetry ward and emergency department
  • Age > 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Patients with R wave less than 0.5 millivolts.
  • Patients with functioning Internal Cardiac Device.
  • Patients with cardiac pacemakers if oversensing by AECD is demonstrated (double counting of pacer spikes).
  • Patients with visible chest lesions that would prevent AECD pad placement.
  • Patients who are designated Do Not Resuscitate.
  • Right bundle branch block.
  • Patients with Parkinson's disease.
  • Patients with seizure disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard of Care Group
Patients will receive standard of care measures in case of cardiac arrest. They will not receive AECD monitoring or intervention
EXPERIMENTAL: AECD Monitoring + Standard of Care Group
Patients will receive AECD monitoring and intervention in addition to standard of care in case of cardiac arrest during admission to the hospital. Defibrillation of pulseless VT/VF by AECD.
In case of cardiac arrest caused by shockable rhythms the automatic external cardioverter defibrillator (AECD) will automatically deliver defibrillation. Automated External Cardioverter Defibrillator (AECD; The PowerHeart CRM, Cardiac Science Inc., Seattle, WA) is a device attached to the chest wall by pads, monitors the electrocardiogram, and is capable of automatically delivering electric countershock to appropriate rhythms without operator intervention. The device will deliver only one shock of 150 Joules for pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Without Defibrillation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Time to defibrillation: interval between onset of VT/VF and delivery of first shock. Expected time to defibrillation for AECD group: 30±30 seconds; expected time to defibrillation for Standard of Care group: 180±180.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Abnormal Rhythms Monitored by the AECD
Time Frame: During the duration of hospital admission on the telemetry ward.
During the duration of hospital admission on the telemetry ward.
Survival to Discharge
Time Frame: At discharge
At discharge
Cerebral Performance at Discharge
Time Frame: At discharge

Cerebral Performance Categories/CPC scale:

CPC 1: Good cerebral performance - conscious, alert, able to work, might have mild neurologic or psychological deficit.

CPC 2: Moderate cerebral disability - conscious, sufficient cerebral function for independent activities of daily life. Able to work in sheltered environment.

CPC 3: Severe cerebral disability - conscious, dependent on others for daily support because of impaired brain function. Ranges from ambulatory state to severe dementia or paralysis.

CPC 4: Coma or vegetative state - any degree of coma without the presence of all brain death criteria. Unawareness, even if appears awake (vegetative state) without interaction with environment; may have spontaneous eye opening and sleep/awake cycles. Cerebral unresponsiveness.

CPC 5: Brain death - apnea, areflexia, electroencephalogram (EEG) silence, etc.

At discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: A. Maziar Zafari, M.D., Ph.D, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta Veterans Adminstration Medical Center/ Emory University, Decatur, GA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 2, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Defibrillation of pulseless VT/VF by AECD

3
Subscribe