Comparative Treatment Study in Patients With Lower Ureteral Stones

November 8, 2006 updated by: Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

Comparative Study in Patients With Lower Ureteral Stones Treated With 10 MG Alfuzosin,10 MG Alfuzosin With Rowatinex, and Rowatinex Alone

We wish to determine the best treatment for expulsion of lower ureteral stones. Which of the three major treatment protocols is the best treatment of conservative management of ureteral stones?

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will include 60 patients with lower ureteral stones. The patients will be divided into three groups. The first group will be administered Alfuzosin (10 mg). The second group will be administered a combination of Alfuzosin (10 mg)and Rowatinex (Pinene 31%, Camphene 15%, Anetol 4%, Borneol 10%, Cineol 3%, Fenchenol 4%, Olive Oil 33%). The third group will be administered Rowatinex.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hadera, Israel, 38100
        • Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of lower ureter (urinary calculi) up to 8mm
  • Must be able to swallow tablets

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sensitivity to Alfuzosin and Rowatinex
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Single kidney
  • Obstructing stone
  • Renal failure creatinine up to 1.8 mg/dl
  • Patients using various alpha blockers
  • Liver failure
  • Fever higher than 38 C
  • UTI
  • Syncope or hypotension
  • Patients treated with PDE5
  • Patients treated with inhibitor CYP3A4
  • Patients refusing participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Other

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gabriel Faragi, Urology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Study Completion

March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2006

Last Verified

November 1, 2006

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Calculi

Subscribe