External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy(ESWL)

December 28, 2015 updated by: Guohua Zeng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Contrast With the Traditional Row of Stone Effect After ESWL: A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The traditional stone row method comprises increasing exercise, drink lots of water, drug row of stone and stone row position. External physical vibration lithecbole(EPVL) is a non-invasive device active row of stone, the researchers hope that through this test prospective clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of in vitro physical vibration row of stones after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL) treatment of stones discharged, thereby improving after ESWL stone clearance rate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole(EPVL) for the treatment after ESWL treatment of stones discharged,thereby improving after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL) stone clearance rate. Investigators will do a multi-centers randomized controlled trial(RCT),and investigators plan to perform this study in 10 hospitals,which are the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China, Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University of China, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Hubei Province Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital, Tongji Hospital,Hubei provincial people's Hospital,Guilin 181 Hospital,the People' Hospital of Huzhou,The People' Hospital of Shaoyang.

Investigators plan to beginning their study August 2015 and end at July 2016. One hundred and eighty patients with ESWL postoperative residual stone will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, all the patients will be assigned to the segment of natural stone row group or physical row of stone group, compared two groups of patients with stone clearance rate and complications, Investigators hope that through this test, improve stone clearance rate after ESWL.

Number:

180cases(90 cases in control group, 90 cases in EPVL group)

Grouping methods:

In this trial, investigators will use equilibrium randomization methods that generate random numerical code table, according to the table, patients are randomly assigned to different groups.

Evaluating indicator Stone-free rate in 4 weeks after ESWL. Incidence rate of complications and adverse reactions after EPVL(fever, hematuria, etc).

Trial method:

Examination before ESWL: blood routine, urine routine, renal function(Cre,BUN), coagulation function; intravenous pyelography(IVP) or CT (radiolucent calculus).

ESWL

Record: duration, frequency, voltage, times.

Method of control group(group1):

ESWL without EPVL; Reexamined by abdominal plain film(KUB) or CT (radiolucent calculus) right after ESWL;

After leaving hospital(without drugs), patients should follow the measures bellowed:

  1. the amount of fluid intake is more than 2000ml/d
  2. increase physical activity
  3. rest in position on uninjured side, patients with lower renal calyx calculus need to invert body.

Method of EPVL group(group2):

Start the treatment of EPVL: the amount of fluid intake is about 1000-2000ml, start the treatment of EPVL when patent's bladder is filling; Reexamined by abdominal plain film(KUB) or CT(radiolucent calculus) right after EPVL;

Record: patients' date, treatment procedure and outcome;

After leaving hospital(without drugs), patients should follow the measures bellowed:

  1. the amount of fluid intake is more than 2000ml/d
  2. increase physical activity
  3. rest in position on uninjured side, patients with lower renal calyx calculus need to invert body;

Follow up timing: return hospital respectively in 1,2 and 4 weeks after EPVL.

Follow up project Laboratory testing: routine urinalysis; Imaging examination: KUB or kidney CT scan (radiolucent calculus) Complications and adverse reactions. Data gathering Fill in follow up table data; Radiological images; IVP or kidney CT scan before ESWL; Reexamined by KUB (radiopaque calculus) or CT (radiolucent calculus) right after EPVL. If stones have been eliminated completely in patients with radiolucent calculus before or at the fourth week of follow-up, investigators must provide kidney CT scan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510230
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age of 18-65 years;
  2. The diameter of calculus is less than or equal to 15mm;
  3. Renal or upper ureteral calculus;
  4. There's no urinary tract obstruction below stones, and stones didn't cause complete urinary tract obstruction;
  5. Stones are fragmented successfully on single session of ESWL, and the diameter of any of fragments is less than 6mm;
  6. Normal renal function,

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Couldn't tolerate EPVL;
  2. Urinary tract anomalies, stricture or obstruction;
  3. Calculus in diverticulum;
  4. Severe hydronephosis;
  5. Combined with acute urinary tract infection;
  6. Coagulation abnormalities;
  7. Morbid obesity(BMI>35kg/m2);
  8. Patients with ureteral stent;
  9. Stones aren't fragment successfully, or the diameter of at least one fragment is more than 6mm ;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Group 1
Patients in Group 1 undergo extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL).
Patients in Group 1 undergo extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL).
OTHER: Group 2
Patients in Group 2 undergo external physical vibration lithecbole for the treatment after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL).A multi-dimensional physical harmonic vibration inertial guidance technology
Multi-dimensional physical harmonic vibration inertial guidance technology
Other Names:
  • Friend-I External Physical Vibration Lithecbole

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone free rate (SFR)
Time Frame: return hospital respectively in 1,2 and 4 weeks after ESWL
Primary SFR is assessed by abdominal plain film (KUB)at 1,2,4 weeks after ESWL. Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments.
return hospital respectively in 1,2 and 4 weeks after ESWL

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
extracorporeal physical vibration complications
Time Frame: return hospital respectively in 1,2 and 4 weeks after ESWL
Complication is defined as any adverse event occurred
return hospital respectively in 1,2 and 4 weeks after ESWL

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Calculi

Clinical Trials on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

3
Subscribe