- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00441792
The Effect of Etomidate on Patient Outcomes After Single Bolus Doses
A Randomized Trial of Etomidate Versus Midazolam for Intubation of Patients With Sepsis.
The primary aim is to determine the difference in hospital length of stay between septic patients given etomidate and those given midazolam for induction during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department. To achieve this aim we plan to perform a prospective randomized trial measuring the length of stay of patients meeting sepsis criteria and requiring intubation. The investigators will compare in-hospital mortality rates between patients given etomidate and patients given midazolam for induction. In addition to hospital length of stay, secondary endpoints between the two groups will include length of stay in the intensive care unit, death within 48 hours of admission, and total number of days intubated.
Research Hypothesis:
In adult patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis and requiring rapid sequence intubation, the length of stay of patients given etomidate will be greater than that of patients given the alternative agent midazolam for induction.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Rationale: Although the use of the drug etomidate for continuous sedation in mechanically ventilated patients was found to have detrimental effects on patient mortality shortly after its introduction into clinical practice, etomidate continues to be widely used as an induction agent for endotracheal intubation. Recent data have called into question the safety of using etomidate for even a single bolus in patients at risk of adrenal insufficiency, emphasizing the fact that single bolus doses of etomidate cause measurable adrenal suppression, and consequently may cause an increase in vasopressor requirements and hospital length of stay. Alternative FDA-approved induction agents, such as midazolam, are claimed by many authors to be safer than etomidate; however, no studies have formally compared these agents.
Research Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that in critically ill adult patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis and requiring rapid sequence intubation, the hospital length of stay of patients given etomidate will be increased compared to patients given midazolam for induction.
Specific Aims: The specific aim is to determine the difference in hospital length of stay between septic patients given etomidate and those given midazolam for induction during rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. The investigators plan to compare the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and duration of intubation by performing a prospective, randomized, trial of critically ill patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis requiring intubation. The investigators will also compare the mortality rates in these two groups while controlling for severity of illness and the use of steroids while hospitalized. Significance: If the use of etomidate to induce anesthesia prior to intubation is found to adversely affect the length of stay of septic patients, a reduction in the length of stay in such patients might be achieved by using alternative agents for induction. The current widespread use of an induction agent that may adversely affect the length of stay of septic patients has significant implications for patient management.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
- Advocate Christ Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All critically ill adult patients who present to the emergency department in need of ventilatory support and having a traumatic or suspected infectious etiology for their illness. Specifically, all patients meeting criteria for severe sepsis, septic shock, or the sepsis syndrome by fulfillment of two of the four criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (temperature greater than 38.3°C or less than 36°C, heart rate greater than 90, respiratory rate greater than 20 or PaCO2 less than 32, white blood cell count greater than 12,000 or less than 4000 or greater than 10% bands).
- All patients presenting in respiratory distress from a presumed pulmonary source of infection and requiring ventilatory support.
- All patients presenting after any traumatic injury and requiring ventilatory support.
Exclusion Criteria:
- An age less than 18
- Pregnancy
- Do-not-resuscitate status
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Etomidate
|
Etomidate at induction dose based on weight
|
Experimental: midazolam
|
Midazolam at induction dose based on weight
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Length of Stay
Time Frame: time in days of hospitalization
|
The primary outcome of the study was hospital length of stay.
|
time in days of hospitalization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mortality
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization.
|
In-hospital mortality.
|
Duration of hospitalization.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Erik B Kulstad, MD, MS, Advocate Christ Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Infections
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
- Inflammation
- Sepsis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Midazolam
- Etomidate
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4257
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityRecruitingSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); New York Presbyterian Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Infection | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
-
Inverness Medical InnovationsCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Etomidate
-
T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİCompletedInduction of AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction | Anesthesia Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse Effect | Propofol Adverse Reaction | Etomidate Adverse ReactionUnited States
-
Maharashtra University of Health SciencesCompletedHemodynamics | Side Effects
-
Xijing HospitalCompletedElderly Patients | Ambulatory SurgeryChina
-
Sichuan Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdCompleted
-
Peking University Third HospitalNot yet recruitingHysteroscopic Surgery | Etomidate Induced Dose
-
University of California, DavisCompletedSurgeryUnited States
-
Ahon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Erasme University HospitalCompleted
-
Korea University Anam HospitalRecruitingSedation Complication | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy | Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionKorea, Republic of