Etomidate vs Propofol-Induction Characteristics (Induction)

June 20, 2016 updated by: Shakuntala Basantwani, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

Comparison of Induction Characteristics of Two Anaesthetic Agents-Etomidate Lipuro and Propofol

The ideal induction agent for day care surgery should have properties of rapid, smooth induction, better haemodynamic profile, faster recovery and devoid of side effects in the form of pain on injection, involuntary movements, respiratory depression and post-operative nausea/vomiting. Propofol is the drug being used for day care surgeries because of its rapid, smooth induction and faster recovery. But its use is associated with pain on injection (even with added lidocaine), hypotension and respiratory depression. So the need for an agent with better hemodynamic control and lesser side effects was felt. The introduction of etomidate lipuro revolutionised the anaesthesia practice. It possesses many of the properties of an ideal induction agent. This newer formulation of etomidate in lipid emulsion i.e. etomidate lipuro is known to have rapid, smooth induction, haemodynamic stability and lesser side effects than older etomidate with propylene glycol (hypnomidate).

Hence, investigators devised a prospective randomized controlled open trial and compared this newer lipid formulation of etomidate with propofol in terms of - induction time, haemodynamic parameters and side effect profile.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The administration of a suitable drug by intravenous route for induction of anaesthesia has been an important component of anaesthetic management.The ability to deliver safe and effective anaesthesia with minimal side effects and rapid recovery is critically important to ensure safe and early discharge. An ideal intravenous (IV) anaesthetic agent should, have rapid onset, rapid recovery, be without undesirable cardiac and respiratory depression and lesser untoward effects like pain on injection, nausea, vomiting etc.No single drug is ideal.

Propofol (propofol 1%) has a smooth and rapid induction, rapid recovery, cerebro-protective effect but it causes hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression pain on injection.Etomidate is a hypnotic agent causing minimal histamine release and very stable hemodynamic profile. In the present study, investigators evaluated the induction characteristics and side effect profile of this newer lipid formulation of etomidate and compared it with propofol in same lipid formulation.

Material and Methods: Hundred ASA I & II patients in the age group 18-60 yrs, scheduled for dilatation and curettage procedure were randomly allocated in two groups based on induction agent Etomidate lipuro or Propofol.

Both groups received intravenous midazolam 0.02mg /kg and fentanyl 2 µg /kg as premedication. After induction with the desired agent titrated to bispectral index Entropy 40, the time to achieve BIS values to 40 (BIS 40 time) were measured. Heart rate, mean arterial pressures were recorded at baseline, induction and upto 10 minutes. Patients were asked for pain at the injection site, postoperative nausea and observed visually for myoclonus, apnea and thrombophlebitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I and II Female patients
  • Elective Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemo-dynamically unstable patients
  • Allergic to egg protein
  • Patients with epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IV Propofol and IV Etomidate lipuro
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1, IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1, Group P Patients received IV Propofol 2mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as a comparator agent in patients undergoing Medical termination of pregnancy(MTP) and Group ' E' Patients received IV Etomidate Lipuro 0.3mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as intervention agent in patients undergoing MTP
Induction of anesthesia using IV Etomidate 0.3mg kg-1 as a single dose in patients undergoing day care procedure, after premedication with IV midazolam 0'.2mg kg-1 and IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1.
Other Names:
  • Etomidate Lipuro
Induction of anesthesia using IV Propofol 2mg kg-1 as a single dose in patients undergoing day care procedure, after premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1 and IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1
Active Comparator: IV Etomidate Lipuro and Placebo
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1, IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1, Group ' E' Patients received IV Etomidate Lipuro 0.3mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as intervention agent in patients undergoing MTP and placebo group received normal saline
Induction of anesthesia using IV Etomidate 0.3mg kg-1 as a single dose in patients undergoing day care procedure, after premedication with IV midazolam 0'.2mg kg-1 and IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1.
Other Names:
  • Etomidate Lipuro
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg/kg and IV Fentanyl 2ug/kg Placebo was given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate per minute
Time Frame: Change in Heart rate per minute from baseline value every five minutes for 30 minutes.
Mean of Heart rate per minute at above mentioned time intervals was measured and any study drug causing bradycardia (Heart rate <50 was noted .
Change in Heart rate per minute from baseline value every five minutes for 30 minutes.
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Change in Mean Arterial Pressure(MAP) in mm of Hg from baseline value every 5 minutes for 30 minutes
Mean value of Mean Arterial Pressures(Summation of MAP divided by number of patients) at above mentioned time intervals was noted and study drug causing Hypotension(MAP< 90mm of Hg) was noted.
Change in Mean Arterial Pressure(MAP) in mm of Hg from baseline value every 5 minutes for 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects of the drugs in the form of Pain on injection
Time Frame: 2 minutes after injection of study drug.
0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. 0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. 0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. Pain on injection was measured using scale as 0 no pain,1verbal complaint to pain,2 withdrawal of arm,3 both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm
2 minutes after injection of study drug.
Myoclonic movements
Time Frame: 60 seconds after injection of study drug
Using Myoclonus scale as 0.No myoclonic movement. I. Minor myoclonic movement. II. Moderate myoclonic movement. III. Major myoclonic
60 seconds after injection of study drug
Thrombophlebitis
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Presence or absence of inflammation of vein through which the drug was injected.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodynamics

Clinical Trials on Inj Etomidate

Subscribe