A Randomised, Controlled Study of Bimesh, Pelvicol for Vaginal Wall Prolapse

February 28, 2007 updated by: Zealand University Hospital
Anterior vaginal wall prolapse is a common problem. Until now many different surgical techniques have been evaluated but so far recurrence is often still observed. Therefore, synthetic mesh or biomesh for vaginal prolapse reconstruction have been introduced.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anterior vaginal wall prolapse is a common problem. Until now many different surgical techniques have been evaluated but so far recurrence is often still observed. Therefore, synthetic mesh or biomesh for vaginal prolapse reconstruction have been introduced. However, is is now known whether these methods are superior to the replication of the pubocervicale fascia, a method which is well described and have been used for many years. Furthermore, most studies evaluating the used of mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse have not been controlled studies and been irrespective to whether the repair was a primary or secondary operation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anterior vaginal wall prolapse greater than grade 2 ICS qualifications, International Continence Society Committee for Standardisation of Terminology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent vaginal prolapse, wault prolapse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Difference in POP-Q measurements for vaginal prolapse

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Affect on bladder function after surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ulla Hviid, MD, Roskilde County Hospital, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Roskilde University Hospital, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 1, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2007

Last Verified

February 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Pelvicol

3
Subscribe