- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00988975
Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
October 1, 2009 updated by: Urogynecology Associates, Indiana
Does Pelvicol Graft in the Posterior Compartment Offer Any Benefit to Surgical Outcomes During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpoperineopexy?
Women with vaginal bulging who are undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at Clarian Health are eligible to enroll in this study.
Two different methods of correcting rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy will be compared for surgical outcome, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction with intercourse and bowel function.
One of the surgical methods uses an additional graft material and one surgical method does not.
It is hypothesized that the method which uses an additional graft material to strengthen the patient's tissues will have a better outcome.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
- Recruiting
- Clarian North
-
Principal Investigator:
- Douglass S Hale, MD
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Recruiting
- Clarian Methodist
-
Principal Investigator:
- Douglass S Hale, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women with stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Exclusion Criteria:
- concomitant colo-rectal procedure
- allergy to pork
- any contraindication to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Pelvicol graft
|
Pelvicol graft
|
|
No Intervention: No graft material
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Anatomic success of rectocele repair
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
change in patient symptomatology post-operatively
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2012
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 1, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
October 2, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 2, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 1, 2009
Last Verified
October 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 09-046
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectocele
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
Alexander KhitaryanRecruitingRectal Prolapse | Rectocele; Female | Rectocele and Incomplete Uterine Prolapse | Rectocele and Complete Uterovaginal ProlapseRussian Federation
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedRectocele | Anterior RectoceleEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruitingObstructed Defaecation Syndrome | Anterior RectoceleEgypt
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompletedSurgery | Rectal Prolapse | Defecation Disorder | Rectocele; FemaleItaly
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse | Rectocele; FemaleEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesTerminated
Clinical Trials on Insertion of pelvicol graft
-
Ajou University School of MedicineRecruitingObesity | Arrhythmias, Cardiac | Cardiovascular Morbidity | Pacemaker ComplicationKorea, Republic of
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedImplant Site Reaction | Bone Loss in JawSyrian Arab Republic
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselCompletedCancer | Malnutrition | InfectionBelgium
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergActive, not recruiting
-
Optomeditech OyCardioMed Device Consultants, LLCTerminated
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompleted
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityKing Saud UniversityCompletedThoracic Surgery | One Lung Ventilation | Left-sided Double Lumen TubeSaudi Arabia
-
Quanta MedicalCousin BiotechCompletedDisk Herniated LumbarFrance
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedOropharyngeal InjuryKorea, Republic of
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or FailedEgypt