- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00443586
Follow-up Evaluation of Home Nurse Visitation Program for Socially Disadvantaged Women and Their Children
Age-27 Follow-up of Early Preventive Intervention
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Nearly half a million children are born each year to single, low-income mothers. Children born to socially disadvantaged mothers are more likely to experience chronic health problems, encounter child abuse and neglect, and receive insufficient health care. Home visitation by nurses during pregnancy and early childhood may prevent a wide range of health and developmental problems in children born to women who are either teenagers, unmarried, or of low economic status.
This study is associated with a home nurse visitation program that first began with 400 socially disadvantaged pregnant women between the years of 1977 and 1980 in an upstate New York semi-rural county. Participants in the original study were randomly assigned to participate in the home nurse visitation program or receive comparison services from pregnancy until the child's second birthday. Participants assigned to receive comparison services were provided with free transportation for prenatal and child care, as well as sensory and developmental screening for the child. Participants assigned to the home nurse visitation program were visited at home by a nurse 9 times during pregnancy and 23 times during the child's first 2 years of life. A follow-up study concluded that the home nurse visitation program reduced the number subsequent pregnancies, use of welfare, child abuse and neglect, and criminal behavior on the part of the socially disadvantaged mothers for up to 15 years after the birth of their first child.
This follow-up study will determine whether a home nurse visitation program has continued long-term effects on a child's health and development, 27 years later. Specifically, this study will evaluate whether the nurse-visited young adult offspring differ from the comparison group in their economic productivity; rates of child abuse and neglect; criminal behavior; mental health; abuse of substances; use of welfare, foster care, and healthcare in relation to government expenditures; and quality of their partnered relationships. Participants within the nurse-visited program group will be compared with each other to determine whether certain characteristics or factors, such as genetic vulnerabilities, environmental risks, or a history of child abuse, make someone less likely to benefit from a home nurse visitation program.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Elmira, New York, United States, 14901
- Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Development Services (CIDS)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Offspring of mothers who had participated in Elmira, N.Y. randomized clinical trial of prenatal and infant/toddler home visiting by nurses.
- Participants needed to be at least 27 years of age.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Developmental Screening
Participants received sensory and developmental screening and referral for further evaluation and treatment of suspected problems at 12 and 24 months of age.
|
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at ages 12 and 24 months of age
|
Active Comparator: Screening plus Transportation
Participants received sensory and developmental screening and referral for further evaluation and treatment of suspected problems at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers received free transportation for regular prenatal and well-child care (through child age two).
|
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at ages 12 and 24 months of age
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2.
|
Active Comparator: Screening, Transport, Prenatal Visits
Participants received sensory and developmental screening and referral for further evaluation and treatment of suspected problems at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers received free transportation for regular prenatal and well-child care (through child age two), plus nurse home visiting during pregnancy.
|
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at ages 12 and 24 months of age
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2.
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2, and were provided an average of 9 home visits by nurses during pregnancy.
|
Experimental: Screen, Transport, Prenatal/Inf Visits
Participants received regular sensory and developmental screening and referral for further evaluation and treatment of suspected problems at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers received free transportation for regular prenatal and well-child care (through child age two), plus nurse home visiting during pregnancy and through child age two.
|
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at ages 12 and 24 months of age
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2.
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2, and were provided an average of 9 home visits by nurses during pregnancy.
Child participants were screened for sensory and developmental problems and referred for further evaluation and treatment at 12 and 24 months of age; their mothers were provided with free transportation for prenatal and well-child care through child age 2, and were provided an average of 9 home visits by nurses during pregnancy and 23 during the child's first two years of life.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Economic productivity (e.g., unemployment, employment in jobs with limited opportunities for career growth, use of welfare, rates of out-of-wedlock births)
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Quality of partnered relationships (violence, commitment, and communication)
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Rates of child abuse and neglect
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Rates of criminal behavior, arrests, convictions, and imprisonment
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Mental health and abuse of substances
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Government expenditures and higher tax revenues
Time Frame: Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Measured when child turns 27 years old
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David L. Olds, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
- Study Director: John Eckenrode, PhD, Cornell University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Izzo CV, Eckenrode JJ, Smith EG, Henderson CR, Cole R, Kitzman H, Olds DL. Reducing the impact of uncontrollable stressful life events through a program of nurse home visitation for new parents. Prev Sci. 2005 Dec;6(4):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-0010-5.
- Eckenrode J, Zielinski D, Smith E, Marcynyszyn LA, Henderson CR Jr, Kitzman H, Cole R, Powers J, Olds DL. Child maltreatment and the early onset of problem behaviors: can a program of nurse home visitation break the link? Dev Psychopathol. 2001 Fall;13(4):873-90.
- Eckenrode J, Ganzel B, Henderson CR Jr, Smith E, Olds DL, Powers J, Cole R, Kitzman H, Sidora K. Preventing child abuse and neglect with a program of nurse home visitation: the limiting effects of domestic violence. JAMA. 2000 Sep 20;284(11):1385-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.11.1385.
- Olds DL, Eckenrode J, Henderson CR Jr, Kitzman H, Powers J, Cole R, Sidora K, Morris P, Pettitt LM, Luckey D. Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA. 1997 Aug 27;278(8):637-43.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Tatelbaum R. Intellectual impairment in children of women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):221-7. Erratum In: Pediatrics 1994 Jun;93(6 Pt 1):973.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Tatelbaum R. Prevention of intellectual impairment in children of women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):228-33. Erratum In: Pediatrics 1994 Jun;93(6 Pt 1):973.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Kitzman H. Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics. 1994 Jan;93(1):89-98.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Phelps C, Kitzman H, Hanks C. Effect of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on government spending. Med Care. 1993 Feb;31(2):155-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199302000-00006.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Tatelbaum R, Chamberlin R. Improving the life-course development of socially disadvantaged mothers: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Am J Public Health. 1988 Nov;78(11):1436-45. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1436.
- Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Chamberlin R, Tatelbaum R. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986 Jul;78(1):65-78.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 04-0002
- DSIR 84-CTP (NIH)
- R01MH070761 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Risk Reduction Behavior
-
Seattle Children's HospitalTickit Health SolutionsCompletedRisk Reduction BehaviorUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHealth Behavior | Risk Reduction BehaviorUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverSmith-Richardson FoundationCompletedRisk Reduction Behavior | Reproductive BehaviorUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Technical University of LisbonCompleted
-
Jose María Maya MejíaUnknown
-
Rhode Island HospitalEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedRisk Behavior | Risk Reduction | Emotion RegulationUnited States
-
Karen HeimerUniversity of Minnesota; U.S. Department of Justice; Cedar Rapids Community School...CompletedRisk Reduction BehaviorUnited States
-
University of OklahomaWithdrawnRisk Reduction Behavior
Clinical Trials on Developmental Screening
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedDevelopmental DelaysUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedDevelopmental Disabilities | Child Development | Ambulatory Care | ScreeningUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverUniversity of Rochester; Medpace, Inc.RecruitingChronic DiseaseUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCornell UniversityCompletedBehavior, Adaptive
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingInfant Development | Development Delay | CardiologyUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknown
-
Biruni UniversityRecruiting
-
University of FloridaAmerican Heart AssociationCompleted
-
Mỹ Đức HospitalRecruitingInfertility | IVF | Development, Child | IVMVietnam
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingProblem With Growth of an InfantChina