Assessing Health Electronically for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology (AHEAD)

April 11, 2023 updated by: Tyler Ketterl, MD, MS, Seattle Children's Hospital

Assessing Health Electronically for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology (AHEAD)

The purpose of this study is to modify an existing Seattle Children's Hospital investigator-developed, patient-centered, electronic health assessment (eHA) called "Check Yourself" for AYAs with cancer. The investigators will then evaluate the new eHA prototype for feasibility and acceptability among AYAs with cancer and their oncology providers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Unmet needs among Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with cancer translate to poor physical and psychosocial outcomes. This is particularly true when it comes to AYA sexual health. Our team has found that intimate relationships and risky health behaviors are common among AYAs during their cancer experience, that oncology clinicians rarely ask about these behaviors, and that AYAs rarely volunteer to share these behaviors. As a result, AYAs with cancer are deprived of the surveillance, anticipatory guidance, and normative support participants would have received if participants were well. Currently there is no standard screening process for risk behaviors and the recommended psychosocial screening for AYAs in the SCH oncology clinic setting. To address this problem, the investigators propose to adapt a validated AYA-targeted electronic health assessment (eHA) screening tool for use in oncology clinics.

The purpose of this study is to modify an existing Seattle Children's Hospital investigator-developed, patient-centered, electronic health assessment (eHA) for AYAs with cancer. The investigators will then evaluate the new eHA prototype for feasibility and acceptability among AYAs with cancer and their oncology providers.

AIM 1. To evaluate the modified eHA program prototype for feasibility, acceptability, and process measures. The investigators will enroll a cohort of N=25 AYAs with cancer and N=10 providers from our institution to "beta-test" the program.

Hypothesis 1: There will be applicable and nonapplicable eHA content for AYAs with cancer in the current electronic health assessment (eHA) tool in addition to content relative to AYAs with cancer that should be developed and added.

Hypothesis 2: AYAs will report that the modified AYA oncology specific eHA is both useful and easy to use. Additionally, oncology providers will report that the eHA tool was useful and positively impacted patient care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 29 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible adolescents and young adults will be 13 to 29 years old, have an oncologic diagnosis for which they are receiving cancer directed therapy, have an appointment to see an SCH oncology provider and will be able to understand English.
  • Eligible oncology providers will either be a Physician (Fellow or Attending) or Advance Practice Provider (Nurse Practitioner or Physicians Assistant), have an appointment to see an adolescent or young adult receiving cancer directed therapy receiving who is also enrolled on the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded from the study if they do not meet age requirements, do not have an appointment in oncology clinic, lack the means to complete follow-up interviews (i.e., has neither telephone nor internet access), and/or are not able to understand English. Our experience in the Seattle region is that, because of English Language Learning schooling supports, inability to read or understand English is a barrier for <0.5% of adolescents. Thus, we do not anticipate that language restrictions will significantly limit the demographic distribution of our participants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: eHA Screening
Patients receiving eHA screening tool.
A validated AYA-targeted electronic health assessment (eHA) screening tool for use in oncology clinics.
Other Names:
  • Electronic Health Assessment (eHA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the feasibility of eHA tool in AYA patients undergoing cancer directed therapy.
Time Frame: 12 months
Determine the feasibility of Electronic Health Assessment (eHA) tool in AYA population with cancer diagnosis using the feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) tool survey.
12 months
Determine the acceptability of eHA tool in AYA patients undergoing cancer directed therapy.
Time Frame: 12 months
Determine the acceptability of Electronic Health Assessment (eHA) tool in AYA population with cancer diagnosis using the acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) tool survey.
12 months
Determine the usability of eHA tool in AYA patients undergoing cancer directed therapy.
Time Frame: 12 months
Determine the usability of Electronic Health Assessment (eHA) tool in AYA population with cancer diagnosis using the usability of intervention of appropriateness measure (IAM) tool survey.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tyler G Ketterl, MD, MS, Seattle Children's Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00002661

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Risk Reduction Behavior

Clinical Trials on Check Yourself - Oncology

3
Subscribe