Effect of Increased Light Exposure on Fatigue in Breast Cancer

January 22, 2019 updated by: Sonia Ancoli-Israel, University of California, San Diego
Patients treated with chemotherapy complain of poor sleep, fatigue and depression. In addition, chemotherapy disrupts the body's internal "biological clock", which may make sleep, fatigue and depression all worse. Women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy are not exposed to much bright light and this may also contribute to the disruption of their body clock, because bright light is necessary for a strong biological clock. One of the easiest ways to strengthen the biological clock is by increasing bright light exposure. The correct timing of the light exposure will help the women feel more alert during the day.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients treated with chemotherapy complain of poor sleep, fatigue and depression. Our preliminary research suggests that these symptoms may all be related, that chemotherapy disrupts circadian rhythms which may exacerbate the poor sleep and fatigue and that during chemotherapy, women are not exposed to much bright light which likely also contributes to the disruption of rhythms. One of the easiest circadian rhythms to measure is sleep/wake activity and the easiest way to synchronize this rhythm is with bright light treatment. It is well established that bright light exposure will make rhythms more robust, and the correct timing of the light exposure will have an alerting effect.

We hypothesize that after bright light treatment compared to dim light treatment during three cycles of chemotherapy: fatigue (measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory), depression (measured by the Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale), functional outcome scores (measured by the Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire and by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast), and sleep measures (measured by actigraphy, e.g., total sleep time, total wake time, bouts of sleep, napping) will all be improved. We also hypothesize that circadian rhythms (measured by actigraphy) will be more robust and more synchronized.

The aims are to examine the effect of bright light treatment on subjective measures of fatigue, mood and functional outcome experienced during chemotherapy, to examine the effect of bright light treatment on the quality and quantity of sleep during chemotherapy, to examine the effect of bright light treatment on sleep/wake rhythms during chemotherapy. Women with breast cancer stages I-III scheduled to begin chemotherapy will be recruited. Wrist actigraphy data (for the measurement of sleep/wake activity) will be collected for three consecutive days and nights immediately preceding chemotherapy and questionnaire data (fatigue, mood, quality of life, functional outcome, sleep) will be collected during this same time period. Half the women will be randomized to receive bright light and the other half to dim red light as a control. Daily bright light or dim light treatment will be administered during cycles 2, 3 and 4 of chemotherapy and all measures (actigraphy and questionnaires) will be repeated during the first and last weeks of cycle 1 and cycle 4 chemotherapy. If bright light can improve sleep rhythms and fatigue, then the quality of life of these women is likely to improve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • Moores UCSD Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stage I-III breast cancer
  • adjuvant or neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under age 18
  • pregnancy
  • metastatic or inoperable (including inflammatory) breast cancer
  • confounding underlying medical illnesses
  • history of mania
  • history of other axis-I psychiatric disorder
  • other physical or psychological impairments -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1 Active Bright White Light Treatment
Intervention: Bright white light, the intervention, was administered via a light box made by Litebook Inc for 30 minutes each morning during four cycles of chemotherapy
Intervention: Bright white light administered for 30 minutes each morning
Active Comparator: 2 Comparator Red Light Treatment
Intervention: Dim red light, the intervention, was administered via a light box made by Litebook Inc for 30 minutes each morning during four cycles of chemotherapy
dim red light administered for 30 minutes every morning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: four cycles of chemotherapy
The Short Form of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (MFSI-sf) was used to measure fatigue. The range of possible score for each subscale is 0 to 24, and the range for total score is -24 to 96, with a higher score indicating more severe fatigue, except for the Vigor subscale, where larger score indicates less fatigue.
four cycles of chemotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CBCRP 11IB-0034

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe