Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

February 18, 2014 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

The purpose of this study is to compare two ways of performing laparoscopic hysterectomy - robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy are decreased postoperative intravenous analgesia requirements, shorter length of hospital stay, quicker return to work and daily activities. Longer operating times have been shown to be offset by shorter hospital stays, with similar hospital costs overall. Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with less blood loss, fewer abdominal wall infections, or febrile episodes. The increased visualization allows for concomitant evaluation and excision of adhesions or endometriosis, as well as facilitating oophorectomy.

Robotic systems were developed in order to facilitate laparoscopy by more ergonomic movements that are easier to perform and more precise. The da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has endowrist instruments that have seven degrees of movement and mimic the human wrist. It can also filter out tremors and other unintentional hand motions that may result from prolonged holding of instruments. The surgeon seated at a console commands the laparoscope and two laparoscopic surgical instruments.

In the literature, several case series have described the use of robotic-assisted hysterectomy. Two of these series included patients that were undergoing surgery for suspected malignancy, and hence has a different patient population that we are going to enroll.Overall these studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using robot-enhanced technology in order to perform hysterectomy in series of approximately 10-20 patients, with a similar rate of complications compared to classical laparoscopy.

The objective of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic assisted versus traditional hysterectomy in the treatment of patients who have benign indications for hysterectomy, e.g. menorrhagia, symptomatic fibroid uteri, etc. Our primary outcome is operative time from incision to either closure or, in the case of concomitant prolapse or incontinence procedures, the completion of the hysterectomy portion of the case, i.e. closure of vaginal cuff and achievement of hemostasis from the hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes include intra-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative complications; post-operative patient outcomes as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Patient scores on this questionnaire before and after surgery can be used to calculate the quality adjusted life years (QALYs), which can then be used in the cost utility analysis. Patients' overall narcotic use and quality of life will also be assessed after surgery with diaries at different intervals. The diaries will consist of a daily narcotic/pain medication diary, a weekly assessment of return to normal activity, and assessments at 2, 4, and 6 weeks of surgical pain and ability to perform functional activities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women who are 18 years of age or greater who are to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Other concomitant laparoscopic or anti-incontinence procedures (e.g., excision of endometriosis or mid-urethral sling procedures) will be performed at the primary surgeon's discretion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • suspected malignancy, medical illness precluding laparoscopy, inability to give informed consent, morbid obesity (BMI>40), or need for concomitant bowel resection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Procedure: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
Active Comparator: 2
Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Procedure: robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy
Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with DaVinci robot

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Operative time from incision to either closure or, in the case of concomitant prolapse or incontinence procedures, the completion of the hysterectomy portion of the case, i.e. closure of vaginal cuff and achievement of hemostasis from the hysterectomy.
Time Frame: Intra-operative time
Intra-operative time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Peri-operative complications; comparison of costs; qualify of life issues; post-operative pain and narcotic use; return to normal activity
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie FR Paraiso, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 07-150

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Fibroids, Menorrhagia, Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in New Zealand

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe