- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00552864
Comparison of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
October 31, 2007 updated by: Centro Cardiologico Monzino
High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia With Ropivacaine or Levobupivacaine for Coronary Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Comparison
In High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia (HTEA) the use of a local anesthetic (LA) with low cardiac toxicity is crucial as myocardial contractility is often already seriously impaired.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, doses and side effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft with HTEA and general anesthesia.
The primary end point is the amount of LA drug required to maintain a VAS < 4 when coughing in the first 24 postoperative hours.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The use of high thoracic epidural, combined with general anesthesia (HTEA) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery has become increasing popular in recent years.
In fact, this technique is potentially beneficial because of the attenuation of the stress response to surgery, the sympathetic tone reduction and the excellent postoperative analgesia.Patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft will be randomly allocated to receive high epidural block with ropivacaine (R) or levobupivacaine (L), supplemented with sufentanil, during and after surgery.
Postoperatively, the rate of epidural infusion will be modified to maintain a VAS score less than 4 in the thoracic area when coughing.
VAS, total amount and rate of epidural drug infusion, MAP, total amount and rate of norepinephrine infusion and motor block will be recorded on arrival in the ICU, on awakening and after 4, 8, 12, 24 hours.
Additionally, the onset time of the epidural sensory block, the time of awakening and the time on ventilator will be recorded as well as episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
61
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milano, Italy, 20138
- Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting
- with stable angina
- left ventricular ejection fraction > 30%
- age > 18 years
- having signed a written informed consent.
- Prothrombin Time (PT) > 80% and Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) within the normal range, and platelet counts (PLT) > 100.000 /mL
Exclusion Criteria:
- emergency operation
- known coagulation disorders or recent thrombolytic therapy
- angina on arrival in the operating room
- acute myocardial infarction within the previous seven days
- clinically significant associated valvular disease
- known neuraxial pathology
- patients participating in other clinical research protocols.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: R
|
0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: L
|
0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The amount of local anesthetic drug (mg) required to maintain a visual analog scale score for pain (VAS) < 4 when coughing.
Time Frame: the first 24 postoperative hours
|
the first 24 postoperative hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
- The onset time of a T1-T6 block after the bolus. - the amount of norepinephrine needed to maintain MAP > 70. - differences in motor block. - side effects.
Time Frame: The first 24 postoperative hours
|
The first 24 postoperative hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Luca Salvi, MD, Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Olivier JF, Le N, Choiniere JL, Prieto I, Basile F, Hemmerling T. Comparison of three different epidural solutions in off-pump cardiac surgery: pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):685-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei238. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
- Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):247-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.003.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2003
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2005
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
November 2, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 2, 2007
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2007
Last Verified
October 1, 2007
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CCMAneste001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.