Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation (nCPAP) in Transient Respiratory Distress of the Newborn (HFPV)

May 12, 2010 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Transient Respiratory Distress of the Newborn: A Randomized Controlled Trial

During caesarean section, transient respiratory distress which occurs frequently (3%) with possible complications are at present managed by non invasive nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (nCPAP) associated with oxygen therapy. Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) is a non-invasive ventilatory mode used in some intensive care units to treat some respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn with a good tolerance, but without evaluation in prospective studies

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Principal Objective: To show that IPV ventilation can decrease the duration of transient respiratory distress as well as the risk of complications.
  • Secondary Objective: Comparison between the two groups regarding: Length of oxygen therapy, complications (pneumothorax, pulmonary infections), need for intensive care hospitalization
  • Study design: Open, prospective randomized trial.
  • Inclusion criteria: Neonates with gestational age ≥ 35 weeks and weight ≥ 2000g, caesarean section, respiratory distress syndrome (modified Silverman score > 5, SpO2 < 90%), management within 20 minutes after birth.
  • Exclusion criteria: clinical thoracic retraction, congenital lung malformation, meconium aspiration, neonatal infection, other congenital malformations.
  • Study plan: After the screening evaluation and written consent document, neonates will be randomized into two groups: nCPAP ventilation or IPV. During the 6 hours after randomization, clinical data will be monitored: cardiac and respiratory frequency (CF -RF), saturation (SaO2), oxygenotherapy, Silverman Score. Then, neonates will be supervised 3 days after normalization of the respiratory distress.
  • Number of subjects: 100 (50 in each group)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Néonatalogie - Maternité - Hôpital Pellegrin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caesarean newborn
  • Gestational age ≥ 35 weeks
  • Weight ≥ 2 kg
  • SaO2 < 90% after 10 min of life
  • Silverman score ≥ 5
  • Treated less than 20 min after birth
  • Social security affiliation (parents)
  • Informed consent signed (parents)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Thoracic retraction
  • Congenital intrathoracic malformations
  • Meconium aspiration
  • Early neonatal infections with hemodynamic troubles
  • Severe neonatal asphyxia
  • Polymalformative syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: nHFPV
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: nCPAP
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventilation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference in time (min) required to normalize the respiratory distress (modified Silverman score = 0, no need for oxygen, RF < 50 bpm and SaO2 > 92%) between the two ventilatory modes
Time Frame: Within the first 6 hours after birth
Within the first 6 hours after birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of pneumothorax, lung infections, transfer to intensive care service, time of oxygenotherapy
Time Frame: Within the first 72 hours after birth
Within the first 72 hours after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clothilde Bertrand, Dr, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2010

Last Verified

May 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Clinical Trials on Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation

3
Subscribe