Minocycline and Perfusion Pressure Augmentation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

March 15, 2013 updated by: Steve Casha, University of Calgary

A Pilot Study to Assess Clinical Safety and Tolerance of Minocycline and Spinal Perfusion Pressure Augmentation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

While research in animal models of spinal cord injury have provided many promising insights, human studies have failed to produce effective therapies. We propose to investigate the drug Minocycline (a metalloproteinase inhibitor) for the treatment of spinal cord injured patients aiming to limit neurological injury and improve neurological outcome. This drug influences several secondary injury mechanisms implicated in spinal cord injury and has been effective in improving outcome after spinal cord injury in animal models. We also propose to examine the safety and feasibility of spinal cord perfusion pressure augmentation with a protocol of IV fluids and inotrope medications versus standard maintenance of mean arterial pressure in subjects who exhibit a decrease in perfusion pressure to less than 75 mmHg. The purpose of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical trial protocol for Minocycline in patients with acute spinal cord injury, and 2) to ensure adequate drug dosing and metabolic effect. After undergoing a process of informed consent, patients agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized to placebo or treatment groups in a double-blind fashion. Clinical neurological examinations, patient-reported quality of life, and functional independence categorization will be combined with serum and cerebrospinal fluid laboratory investigations to establish some of the pharmacological properties and the safety profile of this medication in this group of patients. In addition, patient tolerance to the dosing regimen will be assessed. The results of this study will provide the preliminary data necessary to plan for a larger prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to assess efficacy and to further assess safety.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16 or over
  • Motor complete or motor incomplete acute spinal cord injury involving bony spinal levels between C0 and T11
  • Patient able to provide informed consent
  • Randomization and commencement of administration of first drug dose within 12 hours of injury
  • surgical decompression if needed to be performed within 24 hours of the injury
  • subjects exhibiting spinal cord perfusion pressure (lumbar drain transduced pressure - mean arterial pressure)> 75 mmHg will be randomized to active augmentation protocol versus maintenance of mean arterial pressure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute spinal cord injury >12 hours old
  • Isolated sensory deficit, motor intact
  • Isolated cauda equina injury or injury at bony level T12 or below
  • History of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
  • Pre-existing hepatic or renal disease
  • Tetracycline hypersensitivity
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Isolated sensory deficit
  • Isolated radicular motor deficit
  • Significant leukopenia (white blood cell count < ½ times the lower limit of normal) at screening
  • Elevated liver function tests (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin > 2 times the upper limit of normal) at screening
  • Presence of systemic disease that might interfere with patient safety, compliance or evaluation of the condition under study (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes, Lyme disease, clinically significant cardiac disease, HIV, HTLV-1)
  • Associated traumatic conditions interfering with informed consent or outcome assessment (e.g. closed head injury, liver contusion)
  • Known uncorrected severe coronary artery disease or evidence of active coronary ischemia (ECG changes, positive Troponin) will be excluded from SCPP randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Normal saline 250cc via central line similar to minocycline arm administration protocol
Other Names:
  • saline
  • control
Experimental: Minocycline
Minocycline IV BID x 7 days (first 10 patients 200 mg/dose, subsequent patients adjusted based on pharmacodynamic profiling to 800 mg loading dose, tapered 100 mg each dose to 400 mg then maintain at 400mg until day 7)
Other Names:
  • Minocin
Experimental: SCPP augmentation
maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure at 75 mmHg with fluids and inotrope protocol
Sham Comparator: SCPP control
maintenance of Mean arterial pressure of >65 mmHg with fluids and inotropes protocol without spinal cord perfusion pressure as target or guiding therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Protocol compliance, feasibility and adverse events
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
American Spinal Injury Association - motor score (primary clinical outcome) and sensory scores
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Short Form 36 - Quality of Life Assessment
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
London Handicap Scale
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Spinal Cord Injury Measure
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
CSF collection (6/day) and biochemical assays
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Sequential Anatomical MRI
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven Casha, MD PhD FRCSC, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: R. John Hurlbert, MD PhD FRCSC, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: David Zygun, MD MSc, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Minocycline

3
Subscribe