Titration Pressures in Sleep Apnea Patients Using ThermoSmart® Versus Conventional Humidification

May 22, 2019 updated by: Fisher and Paykel Healthcare

Titrations Pressures in Sleep Apnea Patients Using ThermoSmart® Versus Conventional Humidification

Patients who have Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) may have different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)when titrated with different levels of humidification. It is hypothesised that patients with ThermoSmart® technology (heated breathing tube technology) will have lower titrated pressures than those who are titrated using conventional humidification (non heated breathing tube).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Debate is present concerning the optimal level of humidification for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who need continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Recent evidence has shown that using a heated breathing tube to increase the amount of humidification that can be delivered has decreased patient side effects, increased subjective sleep quality and decreased subjective symptom scores. Anecdotal evidence exists, in the form of clinical observation, when ThermoSmart® technology is utilized during CPAP titration, patients laboratory titrated pressure may in fact prove to be lower. The possibility exists, on a titration night, patients potentially may experience an adverse response to the positive airway pressure which manifests as increased airway resistance and inflammation necessitating higher CPAP pressures to overcome upper airway resistance and flow limitation. Therefore, we hypothesize the delivery of higher levels of humidity might reduce the nasal airway resistance during the titration night, reducing the overall positive airway pressure requirements. The goal is to investigate this phenomenon to find if a reduction in pressure is necessary and if so to what degree. Patients who are titrated on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure devices with ThermoSmart® technology will have lower titrated pressures than those who are titrated using conventional humidification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74135
        • Sleep Center of Tulsa - Midtown
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74137
        • Sleep Center of Tulsa - South

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Female patients over the age of 18
  • Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥15
  • Patients must have at least 5 hours sleep time on each titration night
  • Stable medications for 2 weeks prior to entry to the study and for study inclusion duration including sleep aids

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving or requiring bi-level ventilation
  • Use of a full face interface or chin strap
  • Previous UPPP surgery or palatal reconstruction
  • Recent angina symptoms within 2 weeks of entry
  • CHF with EF < 40%
  • Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome
  • Cheyne Stokes respiration
  • > 50% Central apneas recorded on diagnostic polysomnogram
  • Supplemental oxygen use
  • Use of narcotic pain medication
  • Hypoxemia as determined by room air pulse oxymetry of less than 89% on room air at rest awake
  • Inability to tolerate positive pressure therapy
  • Split Night Evaluations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Heated breathing tube
CPAP with ThermoSmart - heated passover humidifier, with heated breathing tube
Other Names:
  • ThermoSmart
Active Comparator: 2
Non heated breathing tube
CPAP with conventional humidification - heated passover humidifier, no heated breathing tube
Other Names:
  • Conventional humidification

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Titration Pressures After Treatment Nights
Time Frame: End of titration night
Each night, the participant underwent a CPAP titration to determine their therapeutic pressure. During a titration, a sleep technician manually adjusts the participants pressure to determine which pressure is best for that individual in reducing their Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) which is the measure of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) severity. Titration pressures for each group were compared to see if there was any impact of having a heated breathing tube versus a non heated breathing tube on titration pressure.
End of titration night

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship Between the Intervention (Heated Breathing Tube vs Non Heated Breathing Tube) and Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: End of titration night
A correlation table was computed to explore the relationship between the intervention (heated breathing tube vs no heated breathing tube) and total sleep time. This relationship was calculated for each arm and reported by a Correlation Coefficient (r score). The r score represents the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. The value of r is always between -1 and +1. Therefore, an r score of -1 indicates a perfect negative relationship between the intervention and total sleep time. An r score of -.50 indicates a moderate negative relationship between the intervention and total sleep time. An r score of 0 indicates no relationship between the intervention and total sleep time. An r score of +.50 indicates a moderate positive relationship between the intervention and total sleep time. An r score of +1 indicates a perfect positive relationship between the intervention and total sleep time.
End of titration night

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin L Lewis, M.D., Sleep Disorder Centers Institute for Clinical Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Heated breathing tube (CPAP with ThermoSmart)

3
Subscribe