Evaluation of a Diabetes Data Management System

Evaluation of a Diabetes Data Management System In a Clinical Setting

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a diabetes data management program in the hands of potential users, both health care professionals and lay users.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Diabetes

Detailed Description

Diabetes data management programs analyze blood glucose results downloaded from glucose meters to assist health care professionals or lay users manage their diabetes. During the study, subjects download meters, generate and print reports, evaluate the program's ease of use, and verify that they understand the program output.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 51

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Escondido, California, United States, 92026
      • AMCR Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Lay users males or females and health care professionals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Health Care Professionals:

  1. Must have experience using diabetes data management software in the medical office such as downloading meters, reviewing reports (computer screen or printouts), or assisting in patients' diabetes disease management using software.
  2. May include: endocrinologists, primary care physicians, nurse educators, or other medical staff involved in downloading meters or interpreting the data output.

• Lay users must:

  1. Be at least 18 years of age.
  2. Have diabetes (or be the parent or legal guardian of a child with diabetes) and have been testing blood sugar at home at least twice daily for one month or more.
  3. Be able to speak, read and understand English.
  4. Currently using diabetes management software at home or be familiar with diabetes management software. At least 75% of subjects must have been using software for at least one month.
  5. Have experience using PC programs or browsing the internet.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Persons working for a competitive medical device company.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

1

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
health care professionals and lay users; h= 8 health care professionals p= 43 lay users

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants That Rated 80% of Tasks as Very Simple, Simple, or Neither Simple Nor Difficult (Ease of Use of the Software Program)	After completing each task, subjects rated the ease of performing each task on a scale of 1 to 5.; Very Simple; Simple; Neither simple nor difficult; Difficult; Very Difficult Outcome measure was the number of participants that rated 80% of tasks as 1,2, or 3.	1-2 hours
Number of Participants Rated as <= 3 (Success in Using the Program)	Subjects were rated by study staff as to their success at performing basic tasks. The rating scale was: successful; successful after being referred to user instructions; success with assistance (similar to a customer call); unsuccessful 5 = software problem Outcome measure was the number of participants rated as <= 3.	1-2 hours
Number of Participants That Could Answer at Least 85% of the Comprehension Questions Correctly (Comprehension of the Program Reports)	Subjects were asked thirty questions throughout the evaluation to test whether they understood the data displays, graphs and features of the software. Outcome measure was the number of participants that could answer at least 85% of the comprehension questions correctly.	1-2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Ascensia Diabetes Care

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: July 1, 2008
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 6, 2008
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 6, 2008
• First Posted (Estimate): June 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): February 29, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 29, 2016
• Last Verified: January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Metabolic Diseases; Endocrine System Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus
• Other Study ID Numbers: CTD-2008-11