Study of Methotrexate Efficacy Versus Cyclosporine in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients (METHODA)

May 13, 2013 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Multicenter Randomised Study of Methotrexate Efficacy Versus Cyclosporine in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients

The systemic treatments for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited to phototherapy and cyclosporine with the risks respectively of either carcinoma, or hypertension or nephropathy.

Methotrexate was effective in 75% of moderate to severe AD patients with good tolerance in an open retrospective study.

We want to confirm our observations: a non inferiority multicenter clinical trial, methotrexate versus cyclosporine, will be conducted in 100 patients for 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged > 18 years old.
  • Both genders eligible for study.
  • Moderate to severe AD.
  • Scorad > 15.
  • Participants must use a contraceptive method during the trial and for 3 months after the end of the trial for female and 5 months for male participants.
  • Participants must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent, and comply with all aspects of the protocol.
  • Patients must be registered in a social security system or with a health insurance coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Evolutive skin disease.
  • Patients with a clinically significant disease (chronic, recurrent or active).
  • Systemic corticotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment during the previous month, or local corticoid the week before the inclusion.
  • Contra-indication to methotrexate and cyclosporine.
  • Exposure to phototherapy: cumulative dose > 2000 J/cm2.
  • Patients deprived of their civic rights, in custody, or subject to a tutorial, judiciary or administrative decision.
  • Patients under a protection measure.
  • Patients in a critical medical situation.
  • Patients with a personal situation evaluated by the investigator as unable to give optimal participation to the study, or where the study could constitute a risk for the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Ciclosporin
5 mg/kg/day per os during 8 weeks after the posology will be changed according to clinical response during the next 16 weeks
Experimental: 2
Methotrexate
15 mg/week per os in one tablet during 8 weeks after the posology will be changed according to clinical response during the next 16 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
proportion of patients with a 50% decrease of scorad ( scorad 50) after 8 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease of scorad by 50% at week4,12,16,20 and 24
Time Frame: at week4,12,16,20 and 24
at week4,12,16,20 and 24
Decrease of scorad by 75% and 90 % at week 8 and 24
Time Frame: at week 8 and 24
at week 8 and 24
quality of life at week 8 and 24
Time Frame: at week 8 and 24
at week 8 and 24
Concentration of cytokines CCL17 and CCL18
Time Frame: at week 8 and 24
at week 8 and 24
number of adverse events
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-François Nicolas, Professor, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Ciclosporin

3
Subscribe