FERINJECT for Correction of Anaemia in IBD Patients, FER-IBD-COR (FER-IBD-COR)

December 19, 2012 updated by: Vifor Pharma

Select A Multi-centre Randomised Prospective Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy & Safety of a Standardised Correction Dosage Regimen of i.v. Ferric Carboxymaltose Versus Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine how safe, tolerable and effective the new standardised dosage regimen of FERINJECT® infusions is, compared with a well established intravenous iron treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease is mainly attributed to iron deficiency. The main cause of anaemia in IBD patients is chronic blood loss. This means that the iron storage depot in IBD patients is always low and should be replenished. Oral iron therapy is the first choice in many cases because of its safety and economy. However, in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, the effectiveness of oral therapy is reduced. Additionally, oral iron preparations are frequently associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

According to European Guidelines, the preferred route of iron supplementation in IBD is intravenous. Absolute indications for intravenous iron include severe anaemia (Hb <10 g/dL). The current study is a part of a programme investigating the efficacy and safety of FERINJECT®, a new formulation of parenteral iron (5% weight per volume iron containing ferric carboxymaltose in a solution of water for injection).

The efficacy and safety of FERINJECT® were investigated in a prospective, randomised, controlled study conducted in IBD patients. According to the results of this study, FERINJECT® provides a faster Hb response, a higher increase in iron storage and a better patient tolerance compared to oral preparations. In this study, the iron amount required was calculated according to the Ganzoni formula, where 500 mg is the amount of storage iron. To simplify the treatment and to make the treatment more effective, a new standardised dosage regimen was created. The current study is designed to assess whether this new standardised dosage regimen of i.v. FERINJECT® is as safe and effective as the currently used individually calculated dosage regimen.

The efficacy and safety of the new standardised dosage regimen of FERINJECT® will be compared with an already established, well-known treatment of IDA with iron sucrose (VENOFER®). Iron sucrose (VENOFER®) is assessed to be effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of IDA in IBD patients.

The study is a phase IIIb, multi-centre, randomised, prospective, open-label, controlled study performed at 83 study centres in 14 European countries.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the non-inferiority in efficacy of a standardised dosage regimen of FERINJECT® compared to individually calculated dosage regimens of VENOFER® in the correction of IDA in patients with IBD in remission. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a standardised correction dose regimen of FERINJECT®.

Approximately 420 patients will be randomised (1:1 randomisation) to receive treatment with either a standardised correction dosage regimen of FERINJECT® or individually calculated dosage regimens of VENOFER®.

Screening will start between 14 and 7 days before the first infusion is administered. Baseline assessments will be performed on Day 1 before the first infusion.

During the screening period, patients will be selected based on eligibility criteria. Patients who meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will undergo baseline assessments at Baseline (Day 1) prior to the first dose of study medication.

Patients randomised to the FERINJECT® group will receive between 500 mg and 2000 mg of FERINJECT®, according to their Hb and body weight, in up to 3 infusions. The maximum infused weekly dose of will be 1000 mg. For patients in the VENOFER® group, the individual iron deficit will be calculated per individual using the modified formula of Ganzoni. Patients will receive one infusion of 200 mg of VENOFER® twice a week, up to 11 infusions, depending on their calculated iron deficit. Due to the relatively large doses of iron being administered, patients will be monitored carefully throughout the study for symptoms of iron overload.

All patients will return for assessment of efficacy and safety at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The maximum study duration for a patient is 14 weeks. Patients who are not anaemic at Week 12 will be invited to continue to participate in a maintenance study (FER-IBD-07-MAIN), i.e. a study of FERINJECT® versus placebo to determine if the treatment of iron deficiency can prevent the recurrence of anaemia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

484

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • AKH Vienna, University clinic of Int Medizin III

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Patients ≥18 years of age suffering from mild IBD (CD/UC) or in remission (mild IBD defined as CDAI score <220, or CAI score ≤7, remission defined as CDAI score <150, or CAI score ≤4).
  • Hb 7-12 g/dL (female) or 7-13 g/dL (male).
  • Ferritin <100 μg/L.
  • Normal levels of vitamin B12 and folic acid.
  • Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and be practising an acceptable method of birth control during the study and for up to 1 month after the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Chronic alcohol abuse (alcohol consumption >20 g/day).
  • Presence of portal hypertension with oesophageal varices.
  • History of erythropoietin, intravenous or oral iron therapy, or blood transfusion in 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Known hypersensitivity to FERINJECT®.
  • History of acquired iron overload.
  • Myelodysplastic syndrome.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Known active infection, clinically significant overt bleeding, active malignancy.
  • Known chronic renal failure. Vifor Pharma - Vifor (International) Inc Clinical Study Protocol inc. Amendments 1 and 2 Protocol Number: 93842, FER-IBD-07-COR CONFIDENTIAL Final 20 of 48 10 December 2008
  • Surgery with relevant blood loss (defined as Hb drop <2 g/dL) in the last 3 months prior to screening or planned surgery within the following 3 months.
  • Chronic liver disease or increase of liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase ([ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) >3 times the upper limit of normal range.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
  • Inability to fully comprehend and/or perform study procedures in the investigator's opinion.
  • Participation in any other interventional study within 1 month prior to screening.
  • Body weight <35 kg.
  • Significant cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study inclusion, congestive heart failure NYHA (New York Heart Association) grade III or IV, or poorly controlled hypertension according to the judgment of the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FERINJECT® (Ferric carboxymaltose)
Dosage form: 5% w/v iron containing 50 mg iron per mL, as sterile solution of FERINJECT® in water for injection. In case of drip infusion FERINJECT® (10 to 20 ml) must be diluted only in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride (max 250 ml) FERINJECT® will be administered via i.v. drip infusion. Minimum administration time 15 minutes Dosage: 500 mg, 1000 mg, 1500 mg, according to patients' Hb and body weight
Other Names:
  • FERINJECT®
Active Comparator: VENOFER® (Iron Sucrose)

VENOFER® will be administered via i.v. drip infusion, diluted only in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution as follows:

• 10 mL Venofer® (200 mg iron) in maximum 200 mL sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution in at least 30 minutes.

The first 25 mL of solution should be infused as a test dose over a period of 15 minutes. If no adverse reactions occur, use infusion rate no more than 50 mL in 15 minutes.

The individual iron deficit will be calculated using the modified formula of Ganzoni.

If the patient's body mass index is >25, a normalised weight will be used for the calculation of iron deficit. Normalised weight = 25 x height [m] x height [m].

The calculated cumulative VENOFER® dose is to be rounded up or down to the nearest 200 mg.

Patients will receive one 200 mg VENOFER® infusion, twice a week, up to 11 times (max dosage 2200 mg), depending on their calculated iron deficit.

Other Names:
  • VENOFER®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of responders with respect to the baseline Hb value.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Number of responders (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL) with respect to the baseline Hb value.
12 weeks post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients whose Hb increased ≥2 g/dL or who reached normal Hb levels at Week 12.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients who achieved increase of Hb ≥2 g/dL or the normal range of Hb value of Hb ≥12 (female) or ≥13 (male) g/dL) at Week 12.
12 weeks post baseline
Change in disease activity (CDAI, CAI, C-reactive protein [CRP]).
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Change in disease activity (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI], Colitis Activity Index [CAI], C-reactive protein [CRP]) at Week 12.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients at Week 12: TfS: 20 to 50%.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients at Week 12: TfS: 20 to 50%.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of non-anaemic patients at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12 post baseline
The number of non-anaemic patients at Week 12: Hb ≥12 (female) or ≥13 (male) g/dL.
Week 12 post baseline
The number of patients with ferritin >100 µg/L at Week 12.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients with ferritin >100 µg/L at Week 12.
12 weeks post baseline
Maximum increase in Hb, serum ferritin and TfS.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Maximum increase in Hb, serum ferritin and TfS.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients at achieving Hb ≥12 (female) or ≥13 (male) g/dL and ferritin >100 µg/L at Week 12.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients at Week 12: Hb ≥12 (female) or ≥13 (male) g/dL and ferritin >100 µg/L.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients withdrawal from study due to protocol procedure.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients withdrawal from study due to protocol procedure.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of responders (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL) with respect to treatment of underlying disease.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of responders (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL) with respect to treatment of underlying disease.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients with Hb baseline value ≤10 g/dL who achieved Hb increase ≥2 g/dL and the number of patients with Hb baseline value >10 g/dL who achieved Hb increase ≥2 g/dL.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients with Hb baseline value ≤10 g/dL who achieved Hb increase ≥2 g/dL and the number of patients with Hb baseline value >10 g/dL who achieved Hb increase ≥2 g/dL.
12 weeks post baseline
Change in health-related quality of life (QoL) from baseline to Week 12 using the Short Form (SF)-36, version 2 and IBDQ.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Change in health-related quality of life (QoL) from baseline to Week 12 using the Short Form (SF)-36, version 2 and IBDQ.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients out of work due to anaemia or IBD.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of patients out of work due to anaemia or IBD.
12 weeks post baseline
Days out of hospital.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Days out of hospital.
12 weeks post baseline
Hospitalisation rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Hospitalisation rate (hospitalisation due to anaemia and/or IBD).
12 weeks post baseline
Adverse events: type, nature, incidence and outcome.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Adverse events: type, nature, incidence and outcome.
12 weeks post baseline
Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate and bw).
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate and bw).
12 weeks post baseline
Electrocardiogram.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Electrocardiogram.
12 weeks post baseline
Change in laboratory parameters (haematology, clinical chemistry, iron status, urinalysis).
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Change in laboratory parameters (haematology, clinical chemistry, iron status, urinalysis).
12 weeks post baseline
Physical examination.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
Physical examination.
12 weeks post baseline
The number of responders (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL) with respect to the baseline Hb value.
Time Frame: 12 weeks post baseline
The number of responders (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL) with respect to the baseline Hb value.
12 weeks post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Gasche, Professor, Medical University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on Ferric carboxymaltose

Subscribe