Chemoembolization, Irinotecan Bead, Second Line Chemotherapy Treatment of Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PARAGON)

August 9, 2018 updated by: Generic Devices Consulting, Inc.

Feasibility and Prospective Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan Bead in Combination With Second Line Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Irinotecan Bead in combination with intravenous chemotherapy versus intravenous chemotherapy alone in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. The results of this study are intended to be used in support of a PMA application for a combination device

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are many treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, and both the application and outcomes are highly dependant on the patients disposition. Whilst resection results in the best long term survival, it is often not a viable treatment option.

Irinotecan Bead is an embolization device intended to treat colorectal cancer metastases of the liver. As an adjunct to this, irinotecan is present in the microspheres which is released in a controlled manner into the local environment of the tumor. Irinotecan Bead is a combination of an approved embolization device and an approved chemotherapy agent. The device is a PVA based embolization agent from Biocompatibles UK Ltd, and the irinotecan is sourced from an FDA approved supplier.

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase inhibitor, was the first systemic chemotherapy drug other than 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) to demonstrate significant activity in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan is approved for use in combination with 5-FU/folinic acid in patients without prior chemotherapy, and for the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer as a single agent in patients who have failed an established 5-FU containing treatment regimen.

The purpose of this combination device as a treatment for cancer in the liver is twofold:

(i) Nutrient and oxygen starvation of the tumor. (ii) Minimization of chemotherapy wash-out with prolonged contact with tumor tissue.

Irinotecan Bead can be administered intra-arterially in the same manner as conventional TACE. The benefit of this product is that TACE is achieved in a simpler one-step procedure by precisely embolizing the arteries feeding the tumor, and as an ancillary action, the Irinotecan Bead may release a controlled dose of irinotecan into the tumor bed.

The potential benefits of Irinotecan Bead could be significant since a sustainable release of chemotherapy over time could have a greater effect on tumor mass, because optimal therapeutic efficacy of Irinotecan (an S phase-specific cytotoxic drug) generally requires prolonged exposure of the tumor to concentrations exceeding a minimum threshold.

Studies of low-dose, protracted administration of Irinotecan and other camptothecin analogues in mice bearing xenografts of human tumors have shown less toxicity and equal to or better antitumor activity than shorter, more intense dosing schedules. With the proposed device, the in-vivo and pre-clinical data shows that there is reduced systemic levels of Irinotecan, when delivered to tumorous tissue following embolization, and a longer, sustained concentration of the active metabolite, SN-38.

This is a multicentre, open labeled, prospective, randomized, controlled phase II study designed to assess the clinical performance of chemoembolization with Irinotecan Bead in combination with intravenous chemotherapy (irinotecan monotherapy) versus intravenous chemotherapy alone in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer who previously failed first line chemotherapy.

The primary endpoint will be Progression Free Survival measured from the first treatment in this study until progression. Additional endpoints will be Pharmacokinetics of systemic Irinotecan and SN-38 (Irinotecan Bead treatment for feasibility group only); Tumor Response measured according to RECIST; Local tumor response (extent of necrosis in the treated lesions); hepatic progression free survival measured from first treatment until progression in the liver; change in tumor markers (CEA and optional CA19-9); performance status and overall survival assessed by telephone follow-up. Safety will be measured by assessing Adverse Events and Toxicity according to the NCI CTCAE v3.0 criteria.

Approximately 70 patients will be enrolled. The first 10 patients will be enrolled in a feasibility safety evaluation in the test arm of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Cancer Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases (primary tumor may be present)
  • Patients with at least one measurable liver metastases, with size > 1cm (RECIST criteria)
  • Patients with liver dominant disease defined as ≥50% tumor body burden confined to the liver
  • Patients with patent main portal vein
  • Performance status ≤ 2 ECOG
  • Life expectancy > 6 months
  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Patient has failed (discontinued for progression or toxicity) one prior line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, preferably oxaliplatin-based (e.g. FOLFOX, CAPOX). Note that substitutions of oral versus IV 5-FU formulations, changes in 5-FU schedules, or discontinuations/re-starting of the same chemotherapy drugs will not be considered as separate lines of therapy, nor will the addition of "biologics" such as bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab
  • Patient has no previous treatment with irinotecan
  • At least 4 weeks since last administration of last chemotherapy and /or radiotherapy
  • Hematologic function: ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥75 x10-9/L, INR <1.5 (patients on therapeutic anticoagulants are not eligible)
  • Adequate liver function as measured by: Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0mg/dl, ALT, AST ≤5 times ULN, albumin ≥2.5g/dl,
  • Adequate renal function (creatinine ≤ 2.0mg/dl)
  • Women of child bearing potential and fertile men are required to use effective contraception (negative serum βHCG/urine test for women of child-bearing age)
  • Signed, written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient eligible for curative treatment (i.e. resection or radiofrequency ablation). Note: resectability is defined as a single tumor <5cm with adequate liver function defined: Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0mg/dl, ALT, AST ≤5 times ULN, albumin ≥2.5g/dl
  • Contraindications to irinotecan:
  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction
  • History of severe hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate, lactic acid or to any of the excipients of Camptosar
  • Severe bone marrow failure
  • History of Gilbert Syndrome (specific testing not required)
  • Concomitant use with St John's Wort (Hypericum)
  • Active bacterial, viral or fungal infection within 72 hours of study entry
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Previous irinotecan based therapy for metastatic disease
  • Patients' whose only measurable disease is within an area of the liver previously subject to radiotherapy
  • Allergy to contrast media that cannot be managed with standard care (e.g. steroids)
  • Presence of another malignancy with the exception of cervical carcinoma in situ and stage I basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin
  • Contraindicated for MRI or CT
  • Patients previously treated with transarterial embolization (with or without chemotherapy)
  • Any contraindication for hepatic embolization procedures:
  • Large shunt as determined by the investigator (pretesting with TcMMA not required)
  • Severe atheromatosis
  • Hepatofugal blood flow
  • Main portal vein occlusion (e.g. thrombus or tumor)
  • Other significant medical or surgical condition, or any medication or treatment, that would place the patient at undue risk, that would preclude the safe use of chemoembolization or would interfere with study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Chemoembolization
Chemoembolization with Irinotecan Bead in combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy Group (test arm)
Intra arterial chemoembolization using Irinotecan Bead 100mg irinotecan per procedure in combination with irinotecan monotherapy 250mg/m2 alternating on a 3 weekly schedule
Other Names:
  • Trans arterial Chemoembolization
  • Irinotecan Bead
Irinotecan monotherapy: 250mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • camptosar
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Chemotherapy
Irinotecan monotherapy: 250mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks
Irinotecan monotherapy: 250mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • camptosar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Toxicity, Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v3.0)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
0 - No data collected
6 weeks
Tumor Response (RECIST)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Local Tumor Response (Extent of Necrosis in the Treated Lesions)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hepatic Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
Data not collected - study terminated ealry
1 year
Change in Tumor Marker
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Performance Status (ECOG)
Time Frame: 1 year
No data collected
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 5, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unresectable Metastatic Colo-rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Chemoembolization with irinotecan Bead

3
Subscribe