Magna® Mitral Pericardial Bioprostheses Post-Approval Study Protocol

May 12, 2025 updated by: Edwards Lifesciences

Carpentier-Edwards® Perimount Magna® Mitral Pericardial Bioprostheses Models 7000/7000 TFX and Carpentier-Edwards® Perimount Magna® Mitral Ease™ Pericardial Bioprostheses Models 7200TFX and 7300/7300TFX

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the long term safety and effectiveness of the Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT Magna Mitral Valves in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study to be conducted in the US and outside the US (OUS). Approximately 250 subjects are planned to be enrolled to obtain long term data from 101 subjects at 8 years post implant of the Magna mitral valve. Of these 250, approximately 38 (15%) are anticipated to be simultaneous aortic and mitral replacements. Subject enrollment will not start in the US before obtaining FDA approval of this post market study.

Assessments will be obtained for the preoperative and operative visits, and postoperatively at discharge, six months, 1-year and annually thereafter for a minimum of 8 years. Subject's demographics (date of birth, sex), physical assessment (heart rate, height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressures), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, cardiac rhythm, cardiovascular medical history/risk factors, non-cardiovascular conditions, previous cardiovascular procedures/interventions, antithromboembolic and lipid lowering medications and coagulation profile. Blood data will be collected from each subject preoperatively, at 6 months and annually post implant through 8 year follow-ups. Echocardiographic evaluation required for each subject preoperatively, at discharge, 6 months (between 3-6 months), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 year follow-ups. A QOL survey (EQ-5D) will be completed by the subject pre-operatively and at the 6-month follow-up visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

329

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, A-1130
        • Krankenhaus Hietzing
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Quebec
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • St. Paul's Hospital
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Clinica Eppendorf
      • Jena, Germany, 07740
        • Klinikum der Friedrich Schiller University
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Dignity Health Research Institute
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • AdventHealth Orlando
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics
      • West Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50266
        • Iowa Heart Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Medical School
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Spectrum Health Hospitals
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Missouri Baptist Medical Center
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • North Shore University Hospital, NY
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
        • Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient requires, as indicated in the preoperative evaluation, a replacement mitral valve.
  • The patient has signed and dated the subject informed consent form prior to surgery.
  • The patient is expected to survive the surgery and be discharged.
  • The patient is geographically stable and agrees to attend follow-up assessments.
  • The patient is 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has any known non-cardiac life-threatening disease, which will limit the patient's life expectancy below 1 year.
  • The patient presents with active endocarditis within the last 3 months.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient is an intravenous drug abuser.
  • The patient is currently a prison inmate.
  • The patient is currently participating in a study of an investigational drug or device.
  • The patient requires replacement of a native or prosthetic tricuspid or pulmonic valve.
  • The patient requires replacement of a native or prosthetic aortic valve with a prosthesis other than a commercially available Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Valve (i.e. models 2700, 2700TFX, 2800, 2800TFX, 2900, 3000, 3000TFX, 3300TFX)*.
  • The patient was previously enrolled in the study.
  • The patient has had prior aortic, tricuspid and/or pulmonary valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve or mechanical valve that will remain in situ.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Device - CEP Mitral Valve
Mitral valve replacement
Other Names:
  • Magna Mitral 7000/7000TFX, Magna Mitral Ease 7200TFX, 7300/7300TFX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Effectiveness Endpoints
Time Frame: 8 years post-implant
The primary effectiveness endpoint will be the percentage of subjects in NYHA functional classification I or II at 8 years post-implant.
8 years post-implant
Subject's Rate of Objective Performance Criteria Per ISO 5840-2005 - Total Number of Late Adverse Events (by Category) Divided by Late Patient Years (Expressed as a Percentage) for the Magna Mitral Valve Implanted Cohort
Time Frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Time Frame: Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
Total number of early adverse events, in each category, occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D - Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
Time Frame: 6 months post-implant
The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
6 months post-implant
Number of Late Adverse Events Divided by Late Patient Years (Expressed as a Percentage) for the Magna Mitral Valve Implanted Cohort
Time Frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher valve is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size of the patient and the size and type of valve.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Cardiac Output Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Cardiac output is the amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. Cardiac output is evaluated by echocardiography over time. Normal cardiac output in healthy volunteers over 60 years of age was reported between 3.1 and 6.4 liters per minute. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Cardiac Index Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Cardiac index (CI) evaluated by echocardiography. Cardiac index is an assessment of the cardiac output value based on the patient's size. To obtain the cardiac index, divide the cardiac output by the person's body surface area (BSA). Cardiac Index is a useful marker of how well the heart is functioning as a pump by directly correlating the volume of blood pumped by the heart with an individual's body surface area. Normal cardiac output index in healthy volunteers over 60 years of age was reported between 1.1 and 3.2 L/min/m^2. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size of the patient.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Patients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve.
Baseline and 8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Red Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
The red blood cell (RBC) count is a test that measures the number of oxygen-carrying blood cells in your blood. The red blood cell count normal range for women is 4.2 to 5.4 10^6 cells/microliters and for men is 4.7 to 6.1 10^6 cells/microliters. A high red blood cell count may indicate that you have a condition that's preventing you from getting enough oxygen. A low RBC may be caused by an infection, or a medical condition related to anemia. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range may indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection. The normal reference range for WBC count is 4.5 to 10.0 10^3 cells/microliters. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
This is the laboratory analysis of Hemoglobin count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells. In males, a healthy hemoglobin level is between 13.2 and 16.6 g/dL. In females, a hemoglobin count of between 11.6 and 15 g/dL is considered normal and healthy. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Hematocrit Count
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
This is laboratory analysis of Hematocrit percentage on blood drawn from subjects. A hematocrit test measures the proportion of red blood cells in your blood. Red blood cells carry oxygen throughout your body. Having too few or too many red blood cells can be a sign of certain diseases. Normal hematocrit ranges for adult females are 36% to 44% and for adult males are 41% to 50%. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Laboratory Analysis of reticulocytes on blood drawn from subjects. Reticulocytes are newly produced immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood. The reference range for reticulocytes is 0.5 - 2.6 % of red blood cells. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
This is laboratory analysis of Platelet count on blood drawn from subjects. The purpose of platelets is to create hemostasis, which is the prevention of hemorrhaging (bleeding) and the process of keeping blood inside the vessel walls. A normal platelet range is 150 to 450 10^3 cells/microliter. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
The serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues. Normal levels of LDH in the blood can vary depending on the lab but usually range between 140 units per liter (U/L) to 280 U/L for adults and tend to be higher for children and teens. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Laboratory analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin (Pf Hgb) of blood drawn from subject. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood). The reference range for plasma free hemoglobin is 0.0 to 15.2 mg/dL. In general, values higher than this can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Subject's Average Haptoglobin Over Time
Time Frame: 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits
Haptoglobin is a protein produced by your liver. It binds with hemoglobin, which is a protein found in red blood cells. When red blood cells are destroyed, they release hemoglobin. The released hemoglobin is called "free hemoglobin." Haptoglobin attaches to the free hemoglobin to create a haptoglobin-hemoglobin complex. This complex travels to the liver, where it's removed from the body. A normal haptoglobin level falls between 45 and 200 milligrams of haptoglobin per deciliter of blood. In general, results either lower or higher than the normal range can indicate something is wrong.
6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, 7-year, and 8-year follow-up visits

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jennifer Currin, PhD, Edwards Lifesciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

March 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe