Study of Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Hidradenitis Suppurativa

April 14, 2011 updated by: Abbott

A Phase 2 Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This study will investigate how well adalimumab works in people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in the short and long term.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study consists of 2 treatment periods: a 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period (Period 1: Weeks 0 through the end of Week 15) followed by a 36-week open-label period (Period 2: Weeks 16 through 52). Participants are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio based on Hurley Stage as stratification factor to receive adalimumab 40 mg every week (qwk), adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), or matching placebo during Period 1. During Period 2, participants receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow with the option to escalate to 40 mg weekly dosing at Week 28 or Week 31 if the participant has a Physician's Global Assessment of moderate disease or worse (score of greater than or equal to 3). The primary objective of the study is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of participants with moderate to severe chronic hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) after 16 weeks of treatment. The secondary objective is to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy and continued safety of adalimumab for an additional 36 weeks of treatment. (Note: Hurley Stage is a classification system for skin involvement that is largely based on the presence and extent of abscess formation accompanied by scarring and sinus tracts. Hurley Stages are I [abscess formation without scarring and sinus tracts], II [widely separated recurrent abscesses with scarring and sinus tracts], and III [multiple interconnected abscesses and sinus tracts across entire area]. Randomization in this study was performed using stratification by Hurley Stage [III versus (I or II).) At the present time, Period 1 double-blind data only is provided; additional information will be provided when analysis of open-label Period 2 is completed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

154

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen NV, Denmark, 2400
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18683
      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18684
      • Dessau, Germany, 06847
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18471
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18469
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18470
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CA
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18468
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19062
    • California
      • Bakerfield, California, United States, 93309
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18201
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18467
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18207
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18204
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30327
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18209
    • Illinois
      • Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60077
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18202
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47714
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18211
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18203
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18210
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18461
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18466
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19141
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18208
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19001
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18981
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18464
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246-1613
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19061
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78258
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18463
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 18206

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with stable, moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa
  • Negative Chest X-ray and PPD test at Screening. If participant has had a past ulcerative reaction to PPD placement and/or chest X-ray consistent with prior tuberculosis exposure, the participant must initiate, or have documented completion of, a course of anti-tuberculosis therapy.
  • Ability to administer subcutaneous injections
  • General good health otherwise

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior anti-TNF therapy
  • Unstable antibiotic therapy for HS
  • Required medication washouts for other HS treatments
  • Prior exposure to Tysabri® (natalizumab);
  • Recent infection requiring treatment
  • Significant medical events or conditions that may put patients at risk for participation
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study;
  • History of cancer, except successfully treated skin cancer
  • Recent history of drug or alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adalimumab 40 mg qwk
Initial dose of adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, adalimumab 80 mg at Week 2, followed by 40 mg weekly (qwk) starting at Week 4 through Week 15.
Subcutaneous injection using prefilled syringe containing adalimumab 40 mg in 0.8 milliliters
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7
  • Humira
Experimental: Adalimumab 40 mg eow
Initial dose of adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0, followed by adalimumab 40 mg eow (every other week) starting at Week 1 through Week 15.
Subcutaneous injection using prefilled syringe containing adalimumab 40 mg in 0.8 milliliters
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7
  • Humira
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching placebo for adalimumab, administered weekly starting at Week 0 through Week 15.
Subcutaneous injection using prefilled syringe containing 0.8 milliliters

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
Clinical response is defined as a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of clear, minimal, or mild (scores of 0, 1, or 2) with a minimum of 2 grades improvement (reduction) from baseline. PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe).
Baseline, Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of All Inflammatory Nodules and Plaques at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
Includes inflammatory nodules that are tender, erythematous, and have diameters less than 5 cm and includes plaques that have diameters greater than or equal to 5 cm. Range for percent change is negative infinity to infinity. Negative percent changes from Baseline indicate improvement.
Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2
Clinical response is defined as a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of clear, minimal, or mild (scores of 0, 1, or 2) with a minimum of 2 grades improvement (reduction) from baseline. PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe).
Baseline, Week 2
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Clinical response is defined as a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of clear, minimal, or mild (scores of 0, 1, or 2) with a minimum of 2 grades improvement (reduction) from baseline. PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe).
Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
Clinical response is defined as a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of clear, minimal, or mild (scores of 0, 1, or 2) with a minimum of 2 grades improvement (reduction) from baseline. PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe).
Baseline, Week 8
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Clinical response is defined as a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of clear, minimal, or mild (scores of 0, 1, or 2) with a minimum of 2 grades improvement (reduction) from baseline. PGA is a physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe).
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Modified Sartorius Scale at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The Modified Sartorius Scale reflects changes in hidradenitis suppurative symptoms, namely the number of lesions (abscesses, nodules, and fistulas) and the longest distance between lesions. A total score is derived based on assessments at up to 8 distinct anatomical regions and ranges from 5 to indefinite. Smaller numbers are better scores and indicate less lesion involvement, thus decreases (negative changes) from baseline indicate improvement in severity of disease.
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Modified Sartorius Scale at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The Modified Sartorius Scale reflects changes in hidradenitis suppurative symptoms, namely the number of lesions (abscesses, nodules, and fistulas) and the longest distance between lesions. A total score is derived based on assessments at up to 8 distinct anatomical regions and ranges from 5 to indefinite. Smaller numbers are better scores and indicate less lesion involvement, thus decreases (negative changes) from baseline indicate improvement in severity of disease.
Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of All Inflammatory Nodules and Plaques at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Includes inflammatory nodules that are tender, erythematous, and have diameters less than 5 cm and includes plaques that have diameters greater than or equal to 5 cm. Range for percent change is negative infinity to infinity. Negative percent changes from Baseline indicate improvement.
Baseline, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Martin Okun, MD, PhD, Abbott

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Clinical Trials on adalimumab

3
Subscribe