Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease (ReStore)

April 19, 2013 updated by: University of Florida

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease.

The purpose of this research study is to attempt to treat apathy in Parkinson's disease (PD) using high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain and to investigate the patterns of brain activation that may be involved in apathy. It is hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS of the left mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex will improve apathy in PD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Apathy is a syndrome characterized by a primary lack of motivation and it manifests in three domains: behavioral (lack of effort and productivity, dependence on others for structuring daily activities), cognitive (loss of interest in new experiences, lack of concern for one's problems) and affective (flattened affect and lack of response to positive or negative events). Apathy has been consistently attributed to functional disturbance of neural systems involving mesial frontal and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), an area with reciprocal connections with limbic, frontal cortices and the basal ganglia.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive tool used to manipulate activity in specific brain neural circuits through the skull and, in turn, induce short-term (milliseconds) and long-term (minutes to hours) changes in behavior. The duration of effect depends on the stimulation mode. Several studies have now demonstrated that rTMS may facilitate or modulate behavior beyond the actual stimulation. rTMS of the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex (MDLFC) has been used to treat depression presumably because of its modulatory effect on the fronto-cingulate system (MDLFC and the ACC circuitry). Studies have shown that rTMS of the left MDLFC modulates the blood flow response in the ACC. We therefore hypothesize that high-frequency rTMS of the left MDLFC will also improve apathy in PD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosis of "probable" PD, defined by the presence of at least 2 out of 3 cardinal motor features of PD (resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, plus a sustained and significant response to dopaminergic treatment);
  2. age 30 or over; and
  3. on stable medications for at least 30 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. features suggestive of other causes of parkinsonism/ parkinson-plus syndromes;
  2. history of deep brain stimulation or ablation surgery, significant headaches, epilepsy or seizure disorder, mass brain lesions, or major head trauma leading to loss of consciousness of any length;
  3. family (1st degree relatives) history of epilepsy;
  4. evidence for dementia;
  5. presence of contraindications for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI);
  6. history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other psychosis, rapid-cycling bipolar illness, alcohol/drug abuse within the past year;
  7. need for rapid clinical response due to conditions such as initiation, psychosis, or suicidality;
  8. unstable medical condition such as diabetes, cardiac disease, hypertension;
  9. pregnancy; and
  10. colorblindness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation
High-Frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to this treatment will receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) threshold, respectively.
In patients randomized to receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of MEP threshold, respectively.
Other Names:
  • rTMS Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to receive the sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp.
Patients randomized to receive sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp.
Other Names:
  • Sham Treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES)
Time Frame: Pre-Tx; 10 days post tx
The apathy evaluation scale is a 14-item self-report questionaire that provides a quantitative estimate of apathy symptoms. Items are given a score of 0-3, and a total score is summated using all items. Scores may range between 0 and 42. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptoms of apathy, and a score of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms.
Pre-Tx; 10 days post tx

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS)
Time Frame: Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a 33-item interviewer administered structured questionaire designed to assess level of apathetic symptoms. The first 3 items are scored from -2 to +2, while the remainder items are scored from -1 to +1. Scores can range between -36 to +36. The more positive the score, the greater level of apathy symptoms.
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report questionaire that measures depressive symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-3, and items are summated to yield a total score. A higher score is indicative of greater symptoms of depression. Total scores may range between 0 and 63. A score greater than or equal of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms.
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Time Frame: Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item interviewer administered structure questionaire designed to assess symptoms of depression. Items are scored with a range of 0-4, though 11 of the items are scored between 0 and 2. A total score is then calculated of all items which can range from 0 to 74. A higher score is indicative of more depressive symptoms, and a lower score post-tx is indicative of better outcome.
Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hubert H Fernandez, M.D., University of Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

3
Subscribe