Study Comparing Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Of ABBV-951 With Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa Tablets For Treatment Of Motor Fluctuations In Adult Participants With Advanced Parkinson's Disease

October 27, 2022 updated by: AbbVie

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ABBV-951 to Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological condition, which affects the brain. PD gets worse over time, but how quickly it progresses varies a lot from person to person. Some symptoms of PD are tremors, stiffness, and slowness of movement. This study measures the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ABBV-951 versus oral Levodopa (LD)/Carbidopa (CD) [LD/CD] in advanced PD participants to achieve reduction in motor fluctuations.

ABBV-951 is an investigational (unapproved) drug containing Levodopa Phosphate/Carbidopa Phosphate (LDP/CDP) given subcutaneously (under the skin) for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease. Adult participants with advanced PD will be enrolled. Approximately 130 participants will be enrolled in the study in approximately 80 sites across the world.

In one arm, participants will receive ABBV-951 solution as a continuous infusion under the skin plus oral placebo capsules for LD/CD. In the second arm, participants will receive placebo solution for ABBV-951 as a continuous infusion under the skin plus oral capsules containing LD/CD tablets. The treatment duration is 12 weeks.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the course of the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects, and completing questionnaires.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

174

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia, 2170
        • Liverpool Hospital /ID# 218681
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital /ID# 216535
    • Queensland
      • SouthPort, Queensland, Australia, 4215
        • Gold coast University Hospital /ID# 218373
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital /ID# 216533
    • Victoria
      • Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia, 3192
        • Kingston Centre /ID# 216537
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • The Royal Melbourne Hospital /ID# 216536
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham - Main /ID# 216595
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36604-3302
        • University of South Alabama /ID# 216757
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Xenoscience, Inc /ID# 217110
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013-4407
        • Barrow Neurological Institute /ID# 216566
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85018-2111
        • HonorHealth /ID# 216642
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258-4582
        • Movement Disorders Center of Arizona /ID# 216503
      • Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
        • Banner Sun Health Res Inst /ID# 216507
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences /ID# 216501
    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
        • The Parkinson's & Movement Disorder Institute - Fountain Valley /ID# 216705
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710-5473
        • Neuro Pain Medical Center /ID# 216551
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California, San /ID# 216598
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Medical /ID# 216500
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Collaborative Neuroscience Research - Long Beach /ID# 216970
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles /ID# 216674
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105-3149
        • SC3 Research Group - Pasadena /ID# 216821
      • West Hollywood, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center-West Hollywood /ID# 216561
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital /ID# 216527
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80301-1880
        • Alpine Clinical Research Center /ID# 216637
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210-7009
        • Denver Neurological Research, LLC /ID# 216784
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113-2736
        • Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center /ID# 216737
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
        • Christiana Care Health Service /ID# 216515
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Georgetown University Hospital /ID# 216632
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
        • Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton /ID# 216517
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33445
        • Brain Matters Research /ID# 217089
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608-3928
        • Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases /ID# 216514
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176-2148
        • Visionary Investigators Network - Miami /ID# 216679
      • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34470
        • Renstar Medical Research /ID# 216765
      • Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
        • Neurology Associates Ormond Beach /ID# 216521
      • Port Charlotte, Florida, United States, 33980
        • Parkinson's Disease Treatment Center of Southwest Florida /ID# 222656
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida /ID# 216638
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407-3209
        • Premiere Research Institute - Palm Beach /ID# 217207
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30331
        • Duplicate_Atlanta Center for Medical Res /ID# 217091
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • The Neurological Center of North Georgia /ID# 216499
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center /ID# 216567
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical /ID# 217187
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana Clinical Research Cent /ID# 216615
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Univ Kansas Med Ctr /ID# 216528
    • Massachusetts
      • Brighton, Massachusetts, United States, 02135-2907
        • St Elizabeth's Medical Center - Brighton /ID# 216716
    • Michigan
      • East Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48824
        • Michigan State University /ID# 217158
    • Missouri
      • Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63005-1205
        • Clinical Research Professionals - Chesterfield /ID# 216669
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • St. Luke's Hosp. of Kansas City /ID# 216633
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 216548
    • New Jersey
      • Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States, 08648-2300
        • Global Neurosciences Institute /ID# 217875
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
        • Northwell Health /ID# 216833
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Mount Sinai Beth Israel /ID# 216712
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642-0001
        • University of Rochester /ID# 218737
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Univ HS /ID# 216522
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210-1229
        • Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center /ID# 216900
      • New Albany, Ohio, United States, 43054-8167
        • The Orthopedic Foundation /ID# 217157
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74136-6378
        • The Movement Disorder Clinic of Oklahoma /ID# 216860
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97232-2003
        • Legacy Research Institute /ID# 216558
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-5502
        • University of Pennsylvania /ID# 216560
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital /ID# 216553
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
        • Prisma Health-Upstate /ID# 216594
      • Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29650
        • Premier Neurology, P.C. /ID# 217308
      • Port Royal, South Carolina, United States, 29935-2029
        • Coastal Neurology /ID# 217190
    • Tennessee
      • Franklin, Tennessee, United States, 37067-5914
        • KCA Neurology - Franklin /ID# 217419
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-0011
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center /ID# 216675
    • Texas
      • Cypress, Texas, United States, 77429
        • Houston Pulmonary Sleep and Allergy Associates /ID# 216942
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231-4316
        • Kerwin Research Center /ID# 216587
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75243-1188
        • Neurology Consultants of Dallas - LBJ Fwy /ID# 216564
      • Georgetown, Texas, United States, 78628-4126
        • Texas Movement Disorder Specialists /ID# 216523
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital /ID# 216707
      • Round Rock, Texas, United States, 78681
        • Central Texas Neurology Consul /ID# 216629
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Health Care /ID# 216710
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502-3932
        • Meridian Clinical Research /ID# 216731
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23229-4913
        • Neurological Associates - Forest Ave /ID# 216636
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122-5788
        • Swedish Neuroscience /ID# 216526
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202-1342
        • Inland Northwest Research /ID# 221036
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226-3522
        • Medical College of Wisconsin /ID# 216498

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) that is levodopa-responsive.
  • Participant must be taking a minimum of 400 milligrams/day (mg/day) of Levodopa (LD) equivalents and be judged by the investigator to have motor symptoms inadequately controlled by current therapy, have a recognizable/identifiable "Off" and "On" states (motor fluctuations), and have an average "Off" time of at least 2.5 hours/day over 3 consecutive PD Diary days with a minimum of 2 hours each day.
  • Participant or caregiver, if applicable, demonstrates the understanding and correct use of the delivery system, including the insertion of the cannula into the participant's abdomen, as assessed by the investigator or designee during the Screening period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant, unstable medical conditions or any other reason that the investigator determines would interfere with the participant's participation in this study or would make the participant an unsuitable candidate to receive study drug.
  • History of allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to LD or constituents of the study drug (and its excipients) and/or other products in the same class.
  • Participant has not received deep brain stimulation, CD/LD enteral suspension, or any other PD medication as continuous daily infusion, whether commercially available or investigational. Previous exposure to ABBV-951 is not allowed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ABBV-951 + Placebo for Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD)
After an open-label LD/CD Stabilization Period, participants will receive double-blind ABBV-951 by continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) and oral placebo for LD/CD for 12 weeks
Solution for continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI)
Oral capsule
Active Comparator: Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD) + Placebo for ABBV-951
After an open-label LD/CD Stabilization Period, participants will receive double-blind oral LD/CD and CSCI of placebo for ABBV-951 for 12 weeks
Oral encapsulated tablet
Solution for continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "On" Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
"On" time is defined as periods of good motor symptom control, and was assessed by the Parkinson's Disease (PD) diary. The normalized "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia is the sum of the normalized "On" time without dyskinesia and the normalized "On" time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. "On" time without dyskinesia plus "On" time with non-troublesome dyskinesia are based on the PD Diary (normalized to a 16-hour waking day averaged over 3 consecutive days). Baseline value is defined as the average of normalized "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia collected over the 3 PD Diary days before randomization.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "Off" Time (Hours)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
"Off" time is defined as periods of poor mobility, tremor, slowness, and stiffness and was assessed by the PD Diary.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The Part II MDS-UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of PD. MDS-UPDRS is multimodal scale assessing impairment and disability. Part II assesses the participant's motor experiences of daily living with 13 questions. (The numeric score for each question is between 0-4; 0=Normal,1=Slight,2=Mild,3=Moderate,4=Severe). Part II scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of PD.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Early Morning "Off" Status (Morning Akinesia) at Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period

Early morning "Off" status is assessed by the PD Diary as percentage of participants with early morning "Off" upon waking up at Week 12, based on the first morning symptom upon awakening on the last valid PD Diary day at Week 12.

"Off" time is defined as periods of poor mobility, tremor, slowness, and stiffness and was assessed by the PD Diary.

Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "On" Time Without Dyskinesia (Hours)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period

"On" time is defined as periods of good motor symptom control, and was assessed by the PD diary. The normalized "On" time without dyskinesia is defined as the hours of average daily normalized "On" time without dyskinesia as assessed by the PD Diary (normalized to a 16-hour waking day averaged over 3 consecutive days).

Baseline value is defined as the average of normalized "On" time without dyskinesia collected over the 3 PD Diary days before randomization.

Baseline, Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 [never] to 4 [very often]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate higher frequency and more severe impact of PD on sleep.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Quality of Life Assessed by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 Item (PDQ-39) Summary Index Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PDQ-39 is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure aspects of health that are relevant to participants with PD, and which may not be included in general health status questionnaires. It evaluates the 8 dimensions of mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, and communication. Data from the PDQ-39 can be presented in either domain scores or as a summary index score. The full range of the PDQ-39 Summary Index score is from 0 (no patient-related symptoms/quality of life unaffected) to 100 (highest patient-related symptoms/low quality of life).
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Summary Index
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. The health status is converted to an index value using the country-specific weighted scoring algorithm for the United States (US). The summary index value for the US ranges from a worst score of -0.109 to a best score of 1. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Median Bradykinesia Score (BK50) as Assessed by the Parkinson's KinetiGraph/Personal KinetiGraph (PKG) Wearable Device
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a bradykinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as BK50. A higher score indicates worse bradykinesia (there is no prespecified range of scores). The BK50 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Interquartile Range of Bradykinesia Score (BK75-BK25) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a bradykinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as BK50 (there is no prespecified range of scores). BK75-BK25 is the difference between the third quartile (BK75) and first quartile (BK25) bradykinesia scores, and this interquartile range is a measure of variability of bradykinesia. A higher score indicates a higher degree of variability in bradykinesia scores. The BK75 and BK 25 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Median Dyskinesia Score (DK50) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a dyskinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as DK50. A higher score indicates worse dyskinesia (there is no prespecified range of scores). The DK50 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Interquartile Range of Dyskinesia Score (DK75-DK25) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a dyskinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as DK50 (there is no prespecified range of scores). DK75-DK25 is the difference between the third quartile (DK75) and first quartile (DK25) dyskinesia scores, and this interquartile range is a measure of variability of dyskinesia. A higher score indicates a higher degree of variability in dyskinesia scores. The DK75 and DK25 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Number of Participants With Irritation Grade Numeric Grade >= 5 or Letter Grade >= D on the Infusion Site Irritation Scale Across All Study Post-Baseline Visits
Time Frame: Day 2 up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
The investigator or qualified designee evaluated the infusion site area (abdomen). A 2-part (numeric and letter grading) evaluation scale was used to assess irritation. Irritation - Numeric Grades: 0 = No evidence of irritation; 1 = Minimal erythema, barely perceptible; 2 = Moderate erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema, or minimal papular response; 3 = Erythema and papules; 4 = Definite edema; 5 = Erythema, edema, and papules; 6 = Vesicular eruption; 7 = Strong reaction spreading beyond the test site. Irritation - Letter Grades: A = No finding; B = Slight glazed appearance; C = Marked glazing; D = Glazing with peeling and cracking; E = Glazing with fissures; F = Film of dried serous exudates covering all or portion of the patch site; G = Small petechial erosions and/or scabs.
Day 2 up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Oral LD/CD Stabilization Period
Time Frame: From first dose of stabilization period treatment up to the first dose of the double-blind treatment period
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE, whether associated with study drug or not, meeting any of the following criteria is considered a serious AE (SAE): results in death; is life-threatening; results in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious outcome. The severity of each AE is rated as mild, moderate, or severe, and having either a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug. Events were considered treatment emergent if they arose after the first dose of study drug.
From first dose of stabilization period treatment up to the first dose of the double-blind treatment period
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first dose of double-blind treatment up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE, whether associated with study drug or not, meeting any of the following criteria is considered an SAE: results in death; is life-threatening; results in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious outcome. The severity of each AE is rated as mild, moderate, or severe, and having either a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug. Adverse events of special interest include polyneuropathy, weight loss, somnolence, hallucinations/psychosis. Events were considered treatment emergent if they arose after the first dose of study drug.
From first dose of double-blind treatment up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Hematology, Chemistry, Urinalysis, Special Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs, and Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time Frame: Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Measures analyzed for prespecified potentially clinically significant criteria: hematology (hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells, white blood cells, neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelets, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume concentration, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), laboratory (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, creatine phosphokinase, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium bicarbonate, chloride, triglycerides, cholesterol, magnesium), special lab criteria (vitamin B12, vitamin B6, folate, homocysteine, methylmalonic acid), vital signs (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, pulse rate), ECG (heart rate, PR, and QTcF interval), urinalysis (specific gravity, ketones, pH, protein, glucose, blood, bilirubin).
Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Number of Participants With Affirmative Responses on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Across All Study Post-Baseline Visits During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The C-SSRS is a systematically administered instrument developed to track suicidal adverse events across a treatment study. The instrument is designed to assess suicidal behavior and ideation, track and assess all suicidal events, as well as the lethality of attempts. Suicidal ideation categories include the following: wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act but no plan; active suicidal ideation with plan and intent. Suicidal behavior categories include the following: actual attempt; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; preparatory acts or behavior; suicidal behavior; completed suicide.
Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Number of Participants With a Subscore > 5 For Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease - Ration Scale (QUIP-RS) at Any Time During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
The QUIP-RS measures the severity of symptoms and support a diagnosis of impulse control disorders and related disorders in PD. QUIP-RS subscores include gambling (score 0 to 16), sex (score 0 to 16), buying (score 0 to 16), eating (score 0 to 16), hobbyism-punding (score 0 to 32), and PD medication use (score 0 to 16). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For details on when studies are available for sharing, please refer to the link below.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Use Agreement (DUA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Clinical Trials on ABBV-951

Subscribe