Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Relieve in Children Undergoing Groin Surgery (TAP)

December 2, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Relieve in Children Undergoing Inguinal Surgical Procedures: How Does it Compare With the "Gold Standard" Caudal Blockade

For surgery in the region of the lower abdominal wall the administration of local anesthetic drugs in the epidural space via the caudal route is the preferentially used technique since several decades.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block features the advantages of a peripheral nerve blockade. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia and to test the hypotheses that the duration of pain relieve ist prolonged after a TAP block when compared with an epidural technique.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Caudal block (CB) is the gold standard technique for analgesia in children undergoing surgical interventions in the groin.

Although the efficacy and the safety of this technique is high, nonetheless, there are several caveats such as unwarranted motor blockade of the lower limbs and disturbances of the bladder function, potentially resulting in delayed demission in the ambulatory setting. The effect of the blockade wears off within 4-5h post-block, making the administration of additional pain medication necessary.

Peripheral nerve blockades (PNB) are an alternative to CB and have a prolonged duration of the analgesic effect. More recently, an alternative method to block neural structures which innervate lower abdominal wall has been described; the transverse abdominal plane block. The ultrasound guided technique improves the safety of margin. However, although this new technique seems to offer substantial advantages so far only experience from small case series are available. In particular, the TAP block has not been compared in a systematic trial with the "gold standard", the caudal block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4005
        • University Childrens Hospital of both Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female children aged 2 - 8 years
  • physical status classification system (ASA) score I or II
  • Undergoing surgical interventions in the groin (hernia repair, funiculocele ectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to Levobupivacaine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: transversus abdominal plane block

Caudal block: Identification of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique. Administration of Bupivacain 1ml/kg 0.125%.

Transversus abdominal plane block: Identification of the anatomical structures with ultrasound, insertion of the stimuplex needle G22, 50mm, in an in-plane approach and administration of 0.4ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25%.

Caudal block: Identification of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique. Administration of Bupivacain 1ml/kg 0.125%.

Transversus abdominal plane block: Identification of the anatomical structures by the ultrasound technique, administration of 0.4ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy of the postoperative analgesia: monitoring with KUSS or Smiley scale.
Time Frame: 4 h postoperative and morning, 1 day postoperative
4 h postoperative and morning, 1 day postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Erb, PD, University Childrens Hospital of both Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe