Intervention on Maternal Health Care in Rural China (CHIMACA)

August 20, 2015 updated by: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

Structural Hinders to and Promoters of Good Maternal Care in Rural China

This project aims to strengthen and improve the performance of health care system in rural China in order to improve maternal and child health. It also provides policy-makers and health service managers with evidence for the development of informed policy on maternal and child health (MCH). The research focuses on women of reproductive age in rural areas of China as well as on their antenatal and obstetric care service providers, both clinicians and policy makers. For the Member States and China, as well as other countries it will provide a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of current state of affairs, provider and user perspectives, of antenatal and obstetric care in rural China at national and local level. This study seeks to assess whether improving financial accessibility to and quality of maternal health care increase use of and impact of maternity services. This project is implemented in 3 provinces: Anhui, Shaan'xi and Chongqing. This project will provide a practical example and information on impact of abolishing user fees on MCH service utilisation and develop and disseminate evidence-based policy recommendations on how to improve access to and quality of antenatal and obstetrical care for local and central government and international organisations, and thus serve as a step toward reaching such important goals.

CHIMACA includes 3 types of interventions, two behavioural interventions and financial intervention. Behavioural interventions are training for clinical skills and training health education.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Province of Chongqing:

Basic design: randomized townships (3 groups) comparing 2 different interventions to one randomised internal control group and one non-randomized external control group. In service-training:

  1. in service-training of clinical skills: Yes. In non-randomized setting, comparing in-service training to the external control group without training, and in randomized setting comparing in-service training to the internal control group without in-service training.
  2. in service-training of health education: Yes. In non-randomized setting, comparing in-service training to the external control group without training, and in randomized setting comparing in-service training to the internal control group without in-service training.

    • Control groups: one randomized internal control group and one external non-randomised control group.
    • 20 townships in Rongchang County are divided into 2 intervention groups and one internal control group (7 clusters)
    • 6 townships in Tongliang County are randomly selected for an external control group

Province of Shaan'xi:

Basic design: Randomized townships, 5 groups (in two counties) comparing 2 different interventions to the randomized control group (Figure 2)

  • Financial intervention: Yes. In randomized setting, comparing coverage of ante- and postnatal care to in service-training of clinical skills, in non-randomized setting comparing coverage of ante- and postnatal care to normal local coverage system (control group of matched pairs).
  • In service-training:

    1. Clinical skills: Yes. In randomized setting, comparing in service-training of clinical skills to coverage of ante- and postnatal care, in non-randomized setting comparing in service-training of clinical skills to normal local coverage system (control group of matched pairs).
    2. Health education: Yes. In randomized setting, comparing in service training of health education to normal local system, control group (in one county) and to group of clinical skills and control group (in one county).
  • Control group: randomized townships. - 25 townships in Zhen'an County are divided into 2 groups (12 clusters): one intervention and one control group
  • 29 townships in Lantian County are divided into three groups (10 clusters): two intervention groups and one control group.

Province of Anhui Basic design: randomized townships, 3 groups (in two counties), comparing 4 different interventions to randomized control groups (Figure 3)

  • Financial intervention: Yes, in a randomized setting, comparing coverage of antenatal and postnatal care to the control and in-service training groups.
  • In service-training of clinical skills: Yes, in a randomized setting, comparing the in-service training group to the control group and to the group of antenatal and postnatal care.
  • In service-training of health education: Yes, in a randomized setting, comparing two different types of health education to the control group.
  • Control groups: randomized townships
  • 18 townships in Fanchang county are divided into 2 intervention groups (Group 1 and Group 2) and one control group (Group 3)
  • 12 townships in Xuancheng county are divided into two intervention groups (Group 4 and Group 5) and one control group (Group 6).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032
        • Anhui Medical University
    • Chongqing
      • Yurzhong, Chongqing, China, 400016
        • Chongqing Medical University, No.1
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710049
        • Xian Jiaotong University, No.28

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • townships with certain population size and distance to health care facilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • townships having another intervention in health care facilities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Financial coverage of MCH care within the local reimbursement system (CMS).
Experimental: Clinical skills training
In addition to financial coverage (CMS) extensive in-service training of clinical skills (CS) to all doctors and MCH workers at the village and township level.
In addition to financial coverage (CMS) extensive in-service training of clinical skills (CS) to all doctors and MCH workers at the village and township level.
Other Names:
  • training intervention
Experimental: health education
In addition to financial coverage extensive in-service training of health education (HE) to all doctors and MCH workers at the village and township level(Anhui, Chongqing and Shaan'xi provinces); In addition to financial coverage extensive in-service training of health education (HE) for Family planning (FP) staff at village level (Anhui).
In addition to financial coverage extensive in-service training of health education (HE) to all doctors and MCH workers at the village and township level(Anhui, Chongqing and Shaan'xi provinces); In addition to financial coverage extensive in-service training of health education (HE) for Family planning (FP) staff at village level (Anhui).
Other Names:
  • training intervention
Experimental: Financial
In addition to financial coverage of MCH care within the local reimbursement system (CMS) the coverage of ante- and postnatal care.
In addition to financial coverage of MCH care within the local reimbursement system (CMS) the coverage of ante- and postnatal care.
Other Names:
  • funding

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Access to maternal health care
Time Frame: Up to 33 months
Up to 33 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maternal Health

Clinical Trials on clinical skills training

3
Subscribe