Evaluation of Two Different Designs of Bausch & Lomb Contact Lenses

September 11, 2020 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Study to Evaluate the Product Performance of Two Different Designs of Bausch & Lomb PureVision® Contact Lenses

The objective of this one month study is to evaluate the product performance of a redesigned PureVision Contact Lens compared to the PureVision Contact Lens when worn on a daily wear basis by wearers of contact lenses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

376

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Bausch & Lomb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Subjects must be adapted wearers of one of the listed contact lenses
  • Subjects must be myopic
  • Subjects must use a lens care system on a regular basis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within the last 30 days of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses within the last 3 months.
  • Subjects with any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  • Subjects using any systemic or topical medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Subjects with an active ocular disease or are using any ocular medication.
  • Subjects with any "Present" finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear.
  • Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (eg, refractive surgery).
  • Subjects who have participated in any drug or device clinical investigation within two weeks prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Redesigned Purevision Contact Lens
Redesigned Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lens
Lenses will be dispensed at screening visit, subjects will wear lenses on a daily wear basis for one month.
Active Comparator: PureVision Contact Lens
Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lens
Lenses will be dispensed at screening visit, subjects will wear lenses on a daily wear basis for one month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms and Complaints
Time Frame: 1 month
Symptoms/complaints were assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting unfavorable symptoms/complaints and 100 denoting the most favorable rating. The generic scale was comprised of 14 separate questions, where each assessed the denoted symptom/complaint with a score between 0 and 100. The total score was not calculated.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual acuity was assessed by distance high contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
1 month
Percentage of Eyes With > Grade 2 Slit Lamp Findings
Time Frame: 1 month
Graded slit lamp findings for each eye, including epithelial edema, epithelial microcysts, corneal staining, limbal and bulbar injections, upper lid tarsal conjunctival abnormalities, corneal neovascularization, and corneal infiltrates were graded for severity on a scale from 0 (No Finding) to 4 (Severe Finding). The outcome measure is any finding > grade 2, across abnormalities.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gerard Cairns, MCOptom, PhD, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 648

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Redesigned Purevision Contact Lens

3
Subscribe