Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia (eZono)

February 3, 2016 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia

The use of ultrasound imaging techniques in regional anaesthesia is rapidly becoming an area of increasing interest. It represents one of the largest changes that the field of regional anaesthesia has seen. For the first time, the operator is able to view an image of the target nerve directly, guide the needle under real-time observation, navigate away from sensitive anatomy, and monitor the spread of local anaesthetic (LA).The key to successful regional anaesthesia is deposition of LA accurately around the nerve structures.

In the past, electrical stimulation which relied on surface landmark identification, was used for this. However, landmark techniques have limitations; variations in anatomy and nerve physiology , as well as equipment accuracy have had an effect on success rates and complications.

However, alongside the enthusiasm of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia, there should be a degree of informed scepticism. The widespread use of the various techniques of ultrasound-guided regional blocks without adequate training raises the danger of malpractice and subsequent impaired outcome.

Adequate education in the use of regional block techniques under ultrasound guidance is essential. Recent technical developments have achieved higher ultrasound frequencies and better image resolution, as well as better post-processing and user-friendliness.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether new technical features such as reference images, higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution and smaller size and weight of the ultrasound probes may improve outcome (clinical benefits) and may show an increased efficacy and safety. And if the new technology of ultrasound images improves the training quality of trainees and novices in the art of ultrasound-guided blocks.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte / Campus Virchow-Klinikum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at the age of 18 and above who need a regional anesthesia catheter for postoperative pain management after elective orthopedic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another trial according to the German Drug Law 30 days to and during the study
  • Lacking willingness to save and hand out data within the study
  • Accommodation in an institution due to an official or judicial order
  • (Unclear) history of alcohol or substances disabuse
  • Absent knowledge of German language
  • Analphabetism
  • Allergy to local anesthesia or other ingredients of the intravenous solutions
  • For women: Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test within the preoperative screening
  • Operation due to case of emergency, polytrauma or pathologic fracture
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification greater than III
  • Peripheral or central edema
  • AIDS (according to the CDC-classification of HIV-infection: category C)
  • Immunosuppression therapy
  • History of bleeding tendency (e.g. von-Willebrand-disease, thrombocytopenia)
  • Derailed metabolic disorder (e.g. Diabetes mellitus (Glucose > 300 mg/dl) during the preoperative screening)
  • Known history of electrolyte disturbance (e.g. Hyperkalemia > 5.8 mmol/l, Hypernatraemia > 155 mmol/l)
  • Known history of acid-base-dysbalances
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage within one year of participation in the study
  • Neurological or psychiatric disease with limited contractual capability
  • CHF (congestive heart failure) according to (New York Heart Association) classification - NYHA class IV
  • Liver disease (CHILD B or C cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease (MELD-score greater than 10)
  • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl or greater than 150 µmol/l or dependency of haemodialysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: standard 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
Experimental: high-quality 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
Active Comparator: nerve stimulation techniques
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction in time to perform the catheter placement in regional anesthesia
Time Frame: first three days
first three days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in performance: Incidence of complications
Time Frame: first three days
first three days
Improvement of success rate regarding correct catheter placement
Time Frame: first three days
first three days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • eZono

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images

3
Subscribe