PASCONAL NERVENTROPFEN in the Treatment of Nervous Diseases (174)

March 24, 2015 updated by: Pascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate GmbH

PASCONAL NERVENTROPFEN in the Treatment of Adults and Children Suffering From Nervous Diseases (e.g. Sleep Disorders Due to Nervousness)

The purpose of this observational study is to give an overview of the use of PASCONAL NERVENTROPFEN in a 2-4 week treatment of nervous diseases, especially sleep disorders due to nervousness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of this observational study is to give an overview of the use of PASCONAL NERVENTROPFEN in a 2-4 week treatment of nervous diseases, especially sleep disorders due to nervousness.

Efficacy and tolerability of the drug will be assessed. Special regard will be taken to the administration management, dose regimen, and to the effectiveness and safety in special patient groups (children 1-12 years of age), in relation to treatment conformity to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • all over Germany, Germany
        • Multiple German Practices

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Observational groups

Patients (adults and children 1-12 years of age) suffering from nervous diseases, e.g. sleep-disturbances due to nervousness.

Description

Due to the design as an Observational Study no inclusion or exclusion criteria for therapy are named. The included patient group is described under "Cohort / Group".

Observational Criteria (=inclusion criteria for documentation):

  • Males and females
  • Children 1-12 years old
  • Adults >12 years old
  • suffering from nervous diseases, e.g. sleep disorders due to nervousness.

Exclusion criteria for documentation:

  • children younger than 1 year
  • no nervous diseases, e.g. sleep disorders due to nervousness.
  • no treatment with PASCONAL NERVENTROPFEN

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Adults > 12 years
adult patients and patients older than 12 years
Children 6-12 years
children between 6 and 12 years
Children 1-6 years
children between 1 and 6 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sumscore of 12 Individual Symptoms for Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2, and Visit 3
Time Frame: begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
The severity of 12 symptoms (nervousness/restlessness, irritability/eccentricity, sleep disorders, fitful sleep, hyperactivity, nocturnal activity, lack of concentration/forgetfulness, tiredness, discontent, listlessness, gastrointestinal problems, and headache/pressure) was graded on a four-point scale from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (strong complaints) and for the sum score of all 12 individual symptom scores (0 (no complaints) - 36 (all strong complaints).
begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
Nervousness/Restlessness for Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2, Visit 3 and Last Obsevation
Time Frame: begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
The severity of nervousness/restlessness was graded on a four-point scale from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (strong complaints).
begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
Irritability/Eccentricity for Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2, Visit 3 and Last Observation
Time Frame: begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
The severity of irritability/eccentricity was graded on a four-point scale from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (strong complaints).
begin (visit 1), appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
Tolerability After Visit 2 and Visit 3
Time Frame: appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
Assessment of tolerability at visit 2 and visit 3 well tolerated = no side effcts poor tolerated = side effects
appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2), and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of the Sum Score Between Baseline and Last Observation by Concomitant Medication and Treatment Duration
Time Frame: begin (visit 1) and last obvservation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or 4 weeks (visit 3))

The severity of 12 symptoms (nervousness/restlessness, irritability/eccentricity, sleep disorders, fitful sleep, hyperactivity, nocturnal activity, lack of concentration/forgetfulness, tiredness, discontent, listlessness, gastrointestinal problems, and headache/pressure) was graded on a four-point scale from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (strong complaints) and for the sum score of all 12 individual symptom scores (0 (no complaints) - 36 (all strong complaints).

Decrease of the sumscore between baseline and last observation by concomitant medication (with and withour medication) and treatment duration (< 4 weeks and >= 4 weeks)

begin (visit 1) and last obvservation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or 4 weeks (visit 3))
Direction of Change of Symptom Nervousness/Restlessnes Between Baseline and Last Observation by Concomitant Medication
Time Frame: begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
The symptom nervousness/restlessnesswas analysed with respect to the direction of change between baseline (Visit 1) and the last documented visit (Visit 2 or Visit 3) by means of the categories "improved", "unchanged" and "worsened". For each symptom patients were included in the analysis only if the symptom had been present at Visit 1 (i.e. the baseline score value was > 0).
begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
Direction of Change of Symptom Nervousness/Restlessnes Between Baseline and Last Observation by Duration of Treatment
Time Frame: begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
The symptom nervousness/restlessness was analysed with respect to the direction of change between baseline (Visit 1) and the last documented visit (Visit 2 or Visit 3) by means of the categories "improved", "unchanged" and "worsened". For each symptom patients were included in the analysis only if the symptom had been present at Visit 1 (i.e. the baseline score value was > 0).
begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
Direction of Change of Symptom Irritability/Eccentricity Between Baseline and Last Observation by Concomitant Medication
Time Frame: begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
The symptom irritability/eccentricity was analysed with respect to the direction of change between baseline (Visit 1) and the last documented visit (Visit 2 or Visit 3) by means of the categories "improved", "unchanged" and "worsened". For each symptom patients were included in the analysis only if the symptom had been present at Visit 1 (i.e. the baseline score value was > 0).
begin (visit 1) and last observation (could be appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
Direction of Change of Symptom Irritability/Eccentricity Between Baseline and Last Observation by Duration of Treatment
Time Frame: begin (visit 1) and last observation (appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
The symptom irritability/eccentricity was analysed with respect to the direction of change between baseline (Visit 1) and the last documented visit (Visit 2 or Visit 3) by means of the categories "improved", "unchanged" and "worsened". For each symptom patients were included in the analysis only if the symptom had been present at Visit 1 (i.e. the baseline score value was > 0).
begin (visit 1) and last observation (appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) or appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3))
Efficacy Rating for PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN (Last Value) Compared to Previous Therapy by Concomitant Medication (Yes/no)
Time Frame: appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)

Efficacy of the therapy with PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN was rated by the physician on a 4-point rating scale at Visit 2 and Visit 3. The same scale was applied at Visit 1 for evaluation of the efficacy of the previous medication.

The last evaluation for PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN (Visit 2 or Visit 3, according to the LOCF principle) was compared with the rating for the previous therapy by means of the categories "PASCONAL® better", "No difference" and "PASCONAL® worse".

appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)
Efficacy Rating for PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN (Last Value) Compared to Previous Therapy by Treatment Duration
Time Frame: appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)

Efficacy of the therapy with PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN was rated by the physician on a 4-point rating scale at Visit 2 and Visit 3. The same scale was applied at Visit 1 for evaluation of the efficacy of the previous medication.

The last evaluation for PASCONAL® NERVENTROPFEN (Visit 2 or Visit 3, according to the LOCF principle) was compared with the rating for the previous therapy by means of the categories "PASCONAL® better", "No difference" and "PASCONAL® worse".

appr. after 2 weeks (visit 2) and appr. after 4 weeks (visit 3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bianka Krick, Pascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe