Using Videos to Improve Understanding of the Delivery of End-of-life Medical Care in Non-hospital Settings

April 28, 2012 updated by: Angelo E. Volandes, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
To compare the decision making of elderly subjects having a verbal advance care planning discussion compared to subjects using a video.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A.1. Aim 1: To recruit 101 subjects over the age of 64 who are newly admitted to a nursing home facility and randomly assign these subjects to one of two advance care planning (ACP) modalities: 1. a video visually depicting the Goals of Care (Life Prolonging Care, Limited Care, and Comfort Care) (intervention) or 2. a verbal narrative describing the Goals of Care (control) encountered if the subject becomes very ill.

Hypothesis 1: It is feasible to recruit and randomize newly admitted elderly subjects to each of the ACP modalities.

A.2. Aim 2: To compare the care preferences for their primary goal of care (i.e., life-prolonging care, limited care, or comfort care) among 101 subjects randomized to video vs. verbal narrative intervention for ACP.

Hypothesis 2: Subjects randomized to the video intervention will be significantly more likely to opt for comfort care (vs. life-prolonging or limited care) as the primary goal of care compared to those randomized to the verbal narrative.

A.3. Aim 3: To compare knowledge assessment of the Goals of Care of 101 subjects randomized to video vs. verbal narrative intervention for ACP.

Hypothesis 3: When compared to subjects randomized to the verbal narrative arm, subjects in the video group will have higher knowledge assessment scores when asked questions regarding their understanding of the Goals of Care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • MGH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over age of 64
  • have decision making capacity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • do not speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control subjects
verbal narrative of advance care planning
Experimental: intervention group
video decision aid viewed by subjects
Other: video decision aid
video
Other Names:
  • decision aid
  • film

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
preference for medical care
Time Frame: 5 minutes after the survey
preference for care at the end of life
5 minutes after the survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angelo Volandes, MGH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010-P-000180

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elderly

Clinical Trials on video decision aid

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Iran

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe