Brain Activation During Accommodation to Painful Stimulation With FMRI

Brain Activation During Accommodation to Painful Stimulation With Functional Imaging of Pain

Blood oxygen level dependant (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) investigations of pain have provided substantial insight into the workings of the human brain. To date, however, the vast majority of studies have dealt with short painful stimulations. This work will expand the investigators knowledge of how longer stimulations are processed by comparing the activation pattern from a two minute painful stimulation with that of an 30-second painful stimulus. The investigators hypothesis that accommodation to the longer stimulation will be evident by either decreases in signal intensity in brain areas known to process pain, or by increasing activity in brain areas thought to be responsible for the modulation of painful perception.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pain

Detailed Description

Background: Over the past 14 years, BOLD FMRI studies have non-invasively shown that pain activates a matrix of areas, but that this activation decays during stimulation, possibly reflecting the body's ability to "accommodate" to the stimulation. The majority of these use short applications of pain lasting 1 to 30 seconds. However, investigators are now using stimulations much longer than the periods that were typical a few years ago. The effect of signal decay on the activation maps generated by these longer tasks is not known. Because the signal change in many of the subcortical areas involved in pain processing is low, errors in analysis due to neglecting the signal decay may induce significant artifact.

Materials and Methods: Using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, 20 healthy volunteers will experience two different painful stimulations: a repeating 30-second long stimulation and a constant 2 minute stimulation. The brain activity for each will be determined and compared. In addition, the signal decay during each painful stimulation will be quantified and compared.

Significance: Investigators are using longer stimulations periods in an attempt to understand how the brain processes "real- life" pain instead of the artificial on-off pattern of earlier studies. However, significant attention has not been paid to the possible effect of accommodation on the stimulus and how this may impact the activity pattern found. In addition, proof of activation of pain-control areas like the periaquaductal gray while inverse changes are occurring in pain-perceiving areas has not been sought. This study will address both of these issues with a single BOLD FMRI experiment.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 15

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
      • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 50 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects will come from the general surrounding community.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 18 to 50
• Right-handed
• Male or female
• Healthy individuals not taking any medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancy
• Diagnosed with any treated or untreated medical or neurological conditions
• Using any prescription drugs, including antidepressants, pain medications, sedative medications, blood pressure medications, seizure medications, or antipsychotics. Oral contraceptives are permitted
• Using any over-the-counter medications including aspirin, Tylenol, or herbal supplements
• Using any illicit substances
• Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
To determine the areas of brain activity from a 2 minute long painful stimulation	After a 2 minute long painful stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: James W Ibinson, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Ibinson JW, Small RH, Algaze A, Roberts CJ, Clark DL, Schmalbrock P. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of pain: an investigation of signal decay during and across sessions. Anesthesiology. 2004 Oct;101(4):960-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200410000-00022.
• Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Oct;30(5):263-88. doi: 10.1016/s0987-7053(00)00227-6.
• Tracey I, Ploghaus A, Gati JS, Clare S, Smith S, Menon RS, Matthews PM. Imaging attentional modulation of pain in the periaqueductal gray in humans. J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;22(7):2748-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02748.2002.
• Seifert F, Bschorer K, De Col R, Filitz J, Peltz E, Koppert W, Maihofner C. Medial prefrontal cortex activity is predictive for hyperalgesia and pharmacological antihyperalgesia. J Neurosci. 2009 May 13;29(19):6167-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4654-08.2009.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2011
• Study Completion (Actual): October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 15, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 16, 2010
• First Posted (Estimate): November 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 26, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 22, 2017
• Last Verified: June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Pain; Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• Other Study ID Numbers: PRO10020252