Extension Study for Participants of MACI00206 Study of MACI® for the Treatment of Symptomatic Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee (Extension)

May 10, 2021 updated by: Vericel Corporation

An Extension Protocol for Participants of Genzyme-Sponsored Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study of MACI® for the Treatment of Symptomatic Articular Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyle Including the Trochlea

To examine the 5-year efficacy and safety of MACI implant, compared with arthroscopic microfracture, in participants who received study treatment in the SUMMIT study for treatment of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was an open-label, multicenter extension to the SUMMIT study designed to examine the 5-year efficacy and safety of MACI compared to arthroscopic microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in participants who received study treatment in the SUMMIT study. Follow-up to 2 years post-study treatment was completed as part of the SUMMIT study. Follow-up from 3 to 5 years post-study treatment in SUMMIT was completed in this extension study.

All 144 participants who received study treatment in the SUMMIT study were eligible for enrollment into this extension study. Participants had until the end of the visit window for the last visit of this extension study (ie, Week 260 + 6 weeks) to consent to enter this extension study.

Efficacy and safety assessments were performed at scheduled visits 3, 4, and 5 years following treatment in SUMMIT (ie, at Weeks 156, 208, and 260 postarthrotomy for patients treated with MACI implant or at Weeks 156, 208, and 260 postarthroscopy for patients treated with microfracture).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brno, Czechia, 662 50
        • Urazova nemocnice v Brne
      • Praha 8, Czechia, 180 81
        • University Hospital Na Bulovce- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Postgraduate Medical Institute
      • Montpellier Cedex 2, France, 34967
        • Polyclinique Saint-Roch
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Clinique Maussins-Nollet
      • VILLENAVE d'ORNON cedex, France, 33882
        • Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Robert Picqué
      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6202 AZ
        • Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
      • Tilburg, Netherlands, 5022 GC
        • St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508 GA
        • University Medical Centre of Utrecht, Department of Orthopaedics
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7006
        • St Olavs hospital
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-094
        • Orthopaedic & Traumatology of Motor Organs, Independent Public Clinic Hospital
      • Piekary Slaskie, Poland, 41-940
        • Regional Centre of Knee Surgery & Arthroscopy, Regional Hospital of Traumatologic Surgery
      • Warsow, Poland, 01-480
        • Lekmed Medical Center
      • Kungsbacka, Sweden, 434 80
        • Kungsbacka Närsjukhus
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 7LD
        • University of Oxford, Nuffield Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Randomized and received study treatment (MACI or microfracture) in the SUMMIT study.

Description

Randomized and received study treatment (MACI or microfracture) in the SUMMIT study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MACI
autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane implant received in previous MACI00206 study
Implantation received in the previous MACI00206 study
Other Names:
  • MACI
  • matrix applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes
Microfracture
Microfracture treatment received in previous MACI00206 study
Arthroscopic Microfracture treatment received in the previous MACI00206 study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From MACI00206 Baseline for the Participant's Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Pain and Function (Sports and Recreational Activities) Scores.
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline to Week 156
The KOOS is a validated knee-specific instrument developed to assess the patients' opinion of their knee and associated problems. KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, Function in sports and recreational activities, other Symptoms, Function in activities of daily living (ADL), and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A 5-point Likert scale was used to record the response to each item ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Within each subscale, items were added up and normalized to a value between 0 (extreme problems) and 100 (no problems). Subscales are not combined to calculate a total score.
MACI00206 Baseline to Week 156

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From MACI00206 Baseline for the Participant's KOOS Pain and Function (Sports and Recreational Activities) Scores
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
The KOOS is a validated knee-specific instrument developed to assess the patients' opinion of their knee and associated problems. KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, Function in sports and recreational activities, other Symptoms, Function in activities of daily living (ADL), and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A 5-point Likert scale was used to record the response to each item ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Within each subscale, items were added up and normalized to a value between 0 (extreme problems) and 100 (no problems). Subscales are not combined to calculate a total score.
MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessments of Degree of Defect Fill
Time Frame: Week 260
MRI was assessed by the independent blinded evaluators by means of consensus. The number of participants with a degree of defect fill of >50% is reported.
Week 260
Proportion of Patients Who Achieve at Least a 10-point Improvement From MACI00206 Baseline in KOOS Pain and Function (Sports and Recreational Activities) Scores
Time Frame: Up to week 260
A responder is defined as a participant with at least a 10-point improvement in both the KOOS Pain and Function (Sports and Recreational activities) scores from MACI00206 Baseline scores.
Up to week 260
The Proportion of Patients in Each Treatment Group Assessed as Treatment Failures
Time Frame: Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)

Patients were considered as a treatment failure if all of the following 5 criteria were met:

  1. Patient's global assessment of their knee joint compared to Baseline was the same or worse
  2. Physician's global assessment of the patient's knee joint compared to Baseline was the same, worse, or significantly worse.
  3. Percent improvement from Baseline in KOOS Pain score was less than 10%.
  4. Physician diagnostic evaluation of failure excluded etiologies (eg, meniscal tear) other than failed treatment of the index lesion.
  5. The physician decided that surgical re-treatment of the index lesion(s) was required that involved either extensive debridement for lesion expansion, violation of the subchondral bone, or ACI.
Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Average Time to Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Up to 260 weeks

ANALYSIS NOT DONE: The planned analyses concerning time to treatment failure were not conducted due to the small number of per protocol treatment failure cases. The number of per protocol treatment failures in each treatment group are reported here.

Patients were considered as a treatment failure if all of the following 5 criteria were met:

  1. Patient's global assessment of their knee joint compared to Baseline was the same or worse
  2. Physician's global assessment of the patient's knee joint compared to Baseline was the same, worse, or significantly worse.
  3. Percent improvement from Baseline in KOOS Pain score was less than 10%.
  4. Physician diagnostic evaluation of failure excluded etiologies (eg, meniscal tear) other than failed treatment of the index lesion.
  5. The physician decided that surgical re-treatment of the index lesion(s) was required that involved either extensive debridement for lesion expansion, violation of the subchondral bone, or ACI.
Up to 260 weeks
Change From MACI00206 Baseline in the Remaining 3 Subscales (Activities of Daily Living, Quality of Life, and Other Symptoms) of KOOS
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
The KOOS is a validated knee-specific instrument developed to assess the patients' opinion of their knee and associated problems. KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, Function in sports and recreational activities, other Symptoms, Function in activities of daily living (ADL), and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A 5-point Likert scale was used to record the response to each item ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Within each subscale, items were added up and normalized to a value between 0 (extreme problems) and 100 (no problems). Subscales are not combined to calculate a total score.
MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Change From MACI00206 Baseline in the Patient's Evaluation of Overall Knee Condition Using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260

The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is a validated knee-specific measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity that is appropriate for patients with a wide variety of knee problems. The form consists of 18 items covering the domains of symptoms, functioning during activities of daily living and sports, and current function of the knee.

The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is scored by summing the scores for the individual items and then transforming the score to a scale that ranges from 0 to 100. The transformed score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.

MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Change From MACI00206 Baseline in the Patient's Evaluation of Overall Knee Condition Using the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
The Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System is a self-assessment of the intensity of sports participation, functional limitations, and the ability to participate in different types of sports. The Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System overall knee condition score ranges from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent).
MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Change From MACI00206 Baseline in the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical and Mental Component Scores
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260

The SF-12 is a subset of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and includes 8 subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health) that are used to calculate the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) summary component scores.

MCS and PCS are summarized as Z-scores using standard SF-12 scoring and a US population means. The Z-score indicates how many standard deviations a score is from the population mean. Higher values reflect better health. Changes from Baseline are reported.

MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Change From MACI00206 Baseline in the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome (see the EuroQOL Website for details: www.euroqol.org). Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to record the respondents' self-rated health status on a vertical graduated (0-100) VAS where 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine' and 100 is 'the best health you can imagine'.
MACI00206 Baseline and Week 260
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Number of Participants Having Subsequent Surgical Procedures (SSPs) in Target Knee
Time Frame: Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)
Years 2 through 5 post treatment (MACI or microfracture)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MACI00809
  • 2009-016970-33 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Articular Cartilage Defects

Clinical Trials on autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane

Subscribe