Porcine Membrane vs Bovine Wound Dressing in Human Tooth Extraction Sites

February 6, 2026 updated by: University of Nebraska

Comparison of Porcine Collagen Membrane and Bovine Collagen Wound Dressing in Human Extraction Sites With DFDBA Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare porcine collagen membrane and bovine collagen wound dressing in human tooth extraction sites. The outcomes measured will be soft tissue thickness changes as well as bone density changes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a porcine collagen membrane to a bovine collagen wound dressing for atraumatic extractions. These are both commonly used as a barrier and containment material over atraumatic extraction sites that are grafted for future implant placement. The study will include nonsmoking adults aged 18-65 requiring premolar or anterior tooth extraction and graft procedures, who are in good general health and willing to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria include a history of radiation therapy or bisphosphonate use, pregnancy or breastfeeding, systemic conditions that affect bone healing, contraindications to dental implants, and inability to attend follow-up visits. The study will be a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 24 patients who will be assigned to two groups. Prior to tooth extraction, baseline data will be collected; including gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling, and a limited field Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) radiograph. A reference digital scan will be taken to measure volumetric changes in soft tissue. Routine, atraumatic extraction of the tooth under local anesthetic will be performed. Following extraction, hydrated AllOss 50/50 DFDBA:FDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft:freeze-dried bone allograft) bone particulate will be condensed following a routine protocol. One group will receive Mucograft Seal over the graft, and the other group will receive Integra HeliPlug. Patients will be seen at a standard 2-week follow up to remove sutures, have a GCF sampling at the adjacent teeth and take another digital scan. Patients will be seen for an additional 6-week follow up to take a small (2mm) incisional biopsy for histological analysis. Another digital scan and GCF sampling will be taken. Final evaluation will be 3 months post-extraction and will include a localized CBCT evaluation for implant planning and another measure of soft tissue changes with a digital scan. At the time of implant surgery, the core of bone removed during osteotomy will be histologically analyzed for percentage of vital bone. Adverse events will also be recorded at each visit. The primary outcome measure will be the histological composition of tissue at 6 weeks and volumetric tissue changes. The secondary outcome measures will be bone density changes on the post-operative CBCT and inflammatory bio-markers present at baseline, 2-weeks via GCF sampling.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68503
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-smoking
  • Aged 19-65
  • Requiring premolar or anterior tooth extraction and graft procedures
  • Good general health
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of radiation therapy or bisphosphonate use
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Systemic conditions that affect bone healing
  • Contraindications to dental implants
  • Inability to attend follow-up visits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Porcine Collagen Membrane
Atraumatic tooth extraction with porcine collagen membrane placement
Atraumatic tooth extraction with porcine collagen membrane placement
Other Names:
  • Mucograft
Active Comparator: Bovine Collagen Dressing
Atraumatic tooth extraction with bovine collagen dressing placement
Atraumatic tooth extraction with bovine collagen dressing placement
Other Names:
  • Heliplug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft Tissue Thickness in mm
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Soft tissue biopsy to determine tissue thickness, measured in mm
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Density Measurements
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Bone density measurements to assess vital bone, bone tissue that retains living cells and a blood supply, at the extraction site CBCT measurement of bone density at baseline and three months, measured in Hounsfield units
Baseline, 3 Months
Interleukin-1beta
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 Weeks & 6 Weeks
Interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), a pro-inflammatory cytokine primarily produced by immune cells and measured in pg/mL, will be assessed from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples around the extraction site taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 weeks.
Baseline, 2 Weeks & 6 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy C Killeen, DDS, MS, University of Nebraska

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0145-23-FB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Heal

Clinical Trials on Porcine Collagen Membrane

Subscribe