A Safety Study to Assess the Effects of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Exenatide Concentrations on QT Interval in Healthy Subjects

March 24, 2015 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Randomized, Phase 1, Three-Period, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Assess the Electrophysiological Effects of Exenatide at Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Concentrations on the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram QT Interval in Healthy Subjects

Compare the effect of exenatide (therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations), moxifloxacin and placebo on the QT interval.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
        • Research Site
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is overtly healthy, as determined by medical history and physical examination
  • Has body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 35 kg/m2
  • Has fasting serum glucose <110 mg/dL
  • Has no clinically significant blood pressure or heart rate readings as judged by the investigator at study start
  • Has electrocardiogram (ECG) results judged as not clinically significant by the investigator at study start

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a clinically significant medical condition that could potentially affect study participation and/or personal well-being
  • Has an abnormality in the 12-lead ECG that, in the opinion of the investigator, increases the risk of participating in the study, such as a Bazett's corrected QT (QTcB) interval >450 ms.
  • Family history of sudden death
  • Personal history of unexplained syncope within last year, or family history of Long QT Syndrome, or significant active cardiac disease, or symptoms of angina pectoris or transient ischemic attacks within the previous 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
IV Placebo (matching volume of placebo)
Experimental: Exenatide
IV Exenatide (therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations)
Active Comparator: Moxifloxacin
Oral Moxifloxacin (400 mg)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Least Squares (LS) Mean Changes From Baseline in Population-based Corrected QT Intervals (QTcP) Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 1 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 200 pg/mL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1
Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) between exenatide and placebo.
Baseline, Day 1
Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 2 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 300 pg/mL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2
Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between exenatide and placebo.
Baseline, Day 2
Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 3 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 500 pg/mL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3
Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between exenatide and placebo.
Baseline, Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1000h (1 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2
Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo.
Baseline, Day 2
Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1100h (2 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2
Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo.
Baseline, Day 2
Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1200h (3 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2
Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo.
Baseline, Day 2
Number of Subjects With QTcP Interval >450msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo
Time Frame: Day 1, 2, or 3
Number of subjects with QTcP > 450 msec at any timepoint on any day was summarized by frequency for exenatide and placebo.
Day 1, 2, or 3
Number of Subjects With Increase of QTcP Interval From Baseline >30msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, 2, or 3
Number of subjects with increase of QTcP interval from baseline >30 msec at any timepoint on any day was summarized by frequency for exenatide and placebo.
Baseline, Day 1, 2, or 3
Plasma Exenatide Concentrations at Steady State on Day 1, 2 and 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, 2, and 3
The plasma exenatide concentration at steady state was descriptively summarized by geometric mean, standard error, and its effect on placebo-adjusted change from baseline in QTcP was assessed.
Baseline, Day 1, 2, and 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Vice President Research and Development, MD, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Subjects

Clinical Trials on Exenatide

3
Subscribe