- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01324713
Does Gender Play a Role in Bone-mineral Density Measurement Precision?
October 1, 2015 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard for osteoporosis diagnosis and therapy monitoring.
Like all quantitative tests, there is some variability in BMD results obtained when scanning a person more than once.
As such, it is current clinical practice, based on the recommendation of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, that each technologist perform a precision assessment.
This approach consists of scanning 30 people twice; the data from which allow determination of what constitutes a real difference in BMD with 95% confidence.
A precision assessment typically evaluates a specific clinic's population, using the age range and genders seen at that clinic.
However men generally have larger, but often more arthritic, bones than women which may impact the precision results.
Therefore, it is possible that gender-specific precision values should be used in clinical practice, however this issue has never been investigated.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
180
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
- University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population will consist of 90 men and 90 women volunteers who are aged 65 years and older, able and willing to provide informed consent.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Able and willing to sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to have DXA scans performed due to weight ≥ 450 pounds (exceeds densitometer table limit)
- Metallic hardware in, or overlaying, any of the measured skeletal sites
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Males
|
Females
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
DXA Bone Mineral Density precision
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The primary analysis will compare DXA BMD precision (mean square error/variance) in males and females, pooled across technicians, using the two-sample F-test for equality of variances.
Separate analyses will also be performed for each technician.
In addition, due to the sensitivity of the F-test to the normality assumption, a secondary analysis will perform the same comparisons using Levene's test.
A nominal two-sided p-value of 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 25, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
March 29, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 5, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 1, 2015
Last Verified
March 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M-2010-1075
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis
-
Radius Health, Inc.CompletedOsteoporosis | Osteoporosis Risk | Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal | Osteoporosis Fracture | Osteoporosis, Age-Related | Osteoporosis Localized to Spine | Osteoporosis Senile | Osteoporosis of Vertebrae | Osteoporosis VertebralUnited States
-
Radius Health, Inc.CompletedOsteoporosis | Age Related Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis, Age-Related | Osteoporosis Localized to Spine | Osteoporosis Senile | Osteoporosis of VertebraeUnited States, Poland, Italy
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneMinistry of Health, FranceRecruitingPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
AmgenCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisSpain, South Africa, Germany, Mexico, United States, Canada, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Australia, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Czech Republic, Norway
-
Hoffmann-La RocheGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedPost-menopausal OsteoporosisColombia, Belgium, Sweden, Hong Kong, United States, Hungary, Switzerland, Australia, Germany, Italy, Canada, Poland, Argentina, Thailand, Norway, New Zealand, France, Finland