Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Dislocated Clavicle Fractures in Children (ESIN clavicle)

February 13, 2014 updated by: Martin M Kaiser, University of Luebeck

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Dislocated Clavicle Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Lessons Learned From the First 20 Patients

Most Clavicular Fractures in Children can be Treated Conservatively. Our Own Study showed a Benefit towards Much Lower Pain and Better Cosmesis in Adolescents when Treated with Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing.

The First 20 Patients Treated with this Method will be examined for Functional (CONSTANT and MURLEY-Score) and Cosmetic Results as well as Ultrasound-Morphology of both clavicles and Patients'satisfaction (CSS-8). Further on, all complications and problems will be documented.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Luebeck, Germany, 23538
        • Department of Pediatric Surgery University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Last 24 Patients we Treated with ESIN

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Only Dislocated Shaft Fractures or Pseudarthrosis after Conservative Treatment of Dislocated CSF in Children and Adolescents Treated with Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 17 years
  • Pathologic fractures
  • Lateral or Medial Fractures of the Clavicle

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 14, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe