Comparing Two Preventive Regimens for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI)

July 19, 2011 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Comparing the Efficacy of Two Preventive Regimens for Adult Household Contacts With Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Though still an endemic area, the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in Taiwan is decreasing in recent years. Further reduction in TB incidence, or even elimination should rely on treatment for LTBI. However, which is the cost-effective screening method or what is the cost-effective regimen in Taiwan is still unclear.

Therefore, the investigators designed this prospective study to follow up adult household contacts with LTBI for 2 years and compare the efficacy of 9-month isoniazid and 4-month rifampicin).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

In countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis (TB), most new, active cases have occurred among persons who were once infected, contained this infection, and then later developed active TB. Therefore, identifying persons with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) followed by preventive therapy is an important strategy in public health for TB elimination. Until this decade, the diagnosis of LTBI had been based on contact investigation and tuberculin skin testing (TST). However, false-positive results are not uncommon due to its cross-reactivity with the bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine and some species of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), and false-negative results can occur in at least 20% in immunocompromised hosts.

With the application of M. tuberculosis-specific antigens, current interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) have been shown to have a better sensitivity and specificity than TST for detecting host response to M. tuberculosis. Therefore, current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection recommend using IGRA to replace TST. Reports from recent studies comparing the sensitivity, specificity and availability, as well as cost-effective analysis for both tests are inconclusive. The best way varies in different areas, cultures and facilities. Therefore, collecting local data would be very helpful for policy making in public health.

Several regimens have been used in treating LTBI, including 9-month isoniazid, 4-month rifampin, 2-month rifampin plus pyrazinamide, and 3-month isoniazid plus rifampin. Among the 4 regimens, 2-month rifampin plus pyrazinamide has been reported to associate with unacceptable hepatotoxicity and even mortality due to hepatic failure. Therefore, this regimen has now been abandoned in treating LTBI. The treatment completion rate, adverse events, and reduction in risk of developing active TB are similar in 3-month isoniazid plus rifampin as in 6-month Isoniazid. At present, 9-month isoniazid is still the most popular regimen for LTBI, because the toxicity is low, the drug interaction is seldom, and isoniazid has been used for many years. However, the long treatment duration seriously compromises the completion rate. By contrast, rifampin is safe, cheap and more acceptable. Recent studies, including cost-effective analysis, favor using 4-month rifampin in treating LTBI. However, the outcome in these studies is completion rate of preventive therapy, rather than the event of developing active TB. In addition, some use statistic modeling rather conducting a clinical trial.

Though still an endemic area, the incidence of TB in Taiwan is decreasing in recent years. Further reduction in TB incidence, or even elimination should rely on treatment for LTBI. However, which is the cost-effective screening method or what is the cost-effective regimen in Taiwan is still unclear.

Therefore, the investigators designed this prospective study to follow up adult household contacts with LTBI for 2 years and compare the efficacy of 9-month isoniazid and 4-month rifampicin).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 71742
        • Chest Hospital, Department of Health, Executive Yuan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • household contact of patients with newly diagnosed, culture-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis
  • age > 18
  • tuberculin skin testing-positive or QuantiFERON-positive
  • hemoglobin > 8 g/dL
  • neutrophil > 750 /uL
  • total bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL
  • aspartic and alanine transaminases < 2 times of upper limit of normal
  • willing to receive serology tests for HBV and HCV infection
  • no history of allergy to isoniazid and rifampin
  • not currently pregnant or breast-feeding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the M. tuberculosis isolate of the index case were isoniazid- or rifampin-resistant
  • liver cirrhosis
  • clinical or radiographical evidence of active tuberculosis
  • active hepatitis
  • currently receiving medication that have documented drug interaction with isoniazid or rifampin
  • life expectancy < 3 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 4M-RMP
adult household contacts with latent tuberculosis infection receiving 4-month rifampicin preventive therapy
In the 4M-RMP group, enrolled subjects received 600 mg rifampin daily for 4 months. In the 9M-INH group, enrolled subjects received 300 mg isoniazid daily for 9 months.
Other Names:
  • 4-month RMP vs. 9-month INH
Active Comparator: 9M-INH
adult household contact with latent tuberculosis infection receiving 9-month isoniazid preventive therapy
In the 4M-RMP group, enrolled subjects received 600 mg rifampin daily for 4 months. In the 9M-INH group, enrolled subjects received 300 mg isoniazid daily for 9 months.
Other Names:
  • 4-month RMP vs. 9-month INH

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Participants developing active tuberculosis
Time Frame: every 6 months for 2 years
every 6 months for 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the sensitivity and specificity of tuberculin-skin-testing and QuantiFERON TB-Gold assay for the development of active pulmonary tuberculosis
Time Frame: Every 6 months for 2 years

Sensitivity: No. of participants who were test-positive among all participants who developed active pulmonary tuberculosis

Specificity: No. of participants who were test-negative among all participants who did not develop active pulmonary tuberculosis

Every 6 months for 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jann-Yuan Wang, Ph.D., Attending Physician

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Clinical Trials on 4-month rifampin vs. 9-month isoniazid

3
Subscribe