Comparison of Biliary Stenting Alone vs. Stenting With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) During ERCP (PDT)

June 1, 2015 updated by: Michel Kahaleh, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Comparison of Biliary Stenting Alone vs. Stenting With Photodynamic Therapy During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis

This study entails retrospective and prospective review of data from a database protocol. Data gathered will be then analyzed for a set amount of patients. In this study, the investigators will compare biliary stenting vs. biliary stenting plus photodynamic therapy (PDT) and assess if PDT can improve quality of life and prolong survival.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Successful palliation of biliary obstruction is the main goal for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with biliary disease and biliary obstruction related to cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical biliary bypass is unfortunately complicated by a 30-day postoperative mortality rate of between 7 and 24%. Moreover, because of recovery time the quality of life following surgery is only improved in a minority. At present endoscopic insertion of a plastic or metal stent is the method of choice to relieve obstructive jaundice without the high morbidity and mortality associated with surgery. But this relief is unfortunately temporary since stents tend to become obstructed and the fact that effective biliary drainage in the proximal lesion is challenging. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is a new therapeutic approach that specifically targets neoplastic cells. This therapy involves the intravenous administration of a photosensitizing agent followed by activation of the agent by illumination with non-thermal light of a specific wavelength, resulting in cell death from direct cytotoxicity and ischemic necrosis. Cytotoxicity is directly proportional to tissue oxygenation.

A prospective, randomized and controlled trial study by Ortner et all confirmed the significant advantage of PDT with regard to relief of jaundice, quality of life, and survival. The improvement of survival in the randomized PDT group was so impressive that it was believed unethical to continue with randomization after the first 39 patients (20 and 19 in each group).Previously, the principal investigator conducted such a study (and also conducted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with PDT) at the University of Virginia, and would continue to conduct these procedures, as well as the study at WCMC.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects suffering from Cholangiocarcinoma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who has undergone ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography) and Biliary stenting with or without Photodynamic Therapy.
  • Biliary disorder or obstruction due to Cholangiocarcinoma.
  • Above 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who has not undergone ERCP and biliary stenting.
  • Not diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma.
  • Below 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Biliary Stent plus Photodynamic therapy
Biliary Stent group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days patients survived post treatment
Time Frame: 2 years
The group that receives PDT plus stenting will be compared to the group that received stenting only and their survival duration would be evaluated.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholangiocarcinoma

Subscribe