Safety and Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Cilostazol SR and IR Formulations in Healthy Korean Volunteers

October 18, 2011 updated by: Kyungsoo Park, Severance Hospital
This study investigates safety and pharmacokinetic comparison of Pacific Pharma's PP-101 SR (test formulation) and Otsuka's Pletaal® IR (reference formulation) for single and multiple doses and food effects on Pacific Pharma's PP-101 SR in healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male or female volunteers between the ages of 19 and 55 and within 20% of their ideal body weight, without congenital abnormality or chronic disease
  • Female subjects showing positive results on a serum pregnancy test before the study, and those who were of childbearing potential agreed to use one of the following medically accepted methods of contraception during the entire period of the study: abstinence, documented tubal ligation at least 1 year before enrollment in the study, documented placement of an intrauterine device with a proven failure rate of <1% per year, or double barrier methods (a spermicide plus a male condom or female diaphragm).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, endogenous, gastrointestinal, hematologic, neurologic or hemorrhagic disease;
  • Clinically significant findings on routine laboratory (hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis) or ECG tests;
  • Use of prescription drugs in the 14 days immediately prior to starting the study that had the potential to interact with the study medication;
  • Use of any substance that could induce CYP3A4 synthesis (eg, St. John's wort, other herbal medications).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cilostazol

Part 1: a single dose of the SR (200mg x 1 tablet, QD) and IR (100mg x 2 tablets, BID) formulation of cilostazol orally 7 days apart in a fasted state

Part 2: a single dose of the SR (200mg x 1 tablet, QD) formulation of cilostazol 7 days apart in a fasted and a fed state

Part 3: multiple doses of the two formulations for eight consecutive days 21 days apart

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Profile of Pharmacokinetics
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours post-dose for test drug; 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours post-dose for reference drug
Cmax, Area Under Curve
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours post-dose for test drug; 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 36, 48, 72 hours post-dose for reference drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PCF_PP-101

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Pletaal

Subscribe