Secondary Prevention and Health Promotion After Stroke

January 22, 2014 updated by: Ann-Cathrin Jonsson, Skane University Hospital

Secondary Prevention and Health Promotion After Stroke A Nurse-led Randomized Controlled Open Trial

The aim of this study was to examine to what extent a one year population of stroke patients at a university hospital had well regulated risk factors and health problems one year after stroke, and if a structured nurse-led previous follow-up in the intervention group including referrals if needed could influence health outcome and risk factors one year after stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The follow-up protocol was categorized into Risk factors, Patients' self-reports, and Other health problems. Referral was sent to a physician if medical interventions were needed regarding risk factors measured above the limits as stated in the follow-up protocol in accordance with guidelines,and/or if any self-reported health problems were stated by the patients, or had been detected by the Specialist Nurse. Primary outcome was comparison between the intervention group and control group at one year after stroke regarding proportion of regulated risk factors, and self-reports on health outcome. Results of the two follow-ups of the intervention group were also compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

597

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Malmö, Sweden, 205 02
        • Skane University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

WHO criteria for definition of stroke Signed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Other diagnosis causing neurological symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention group
Control of secondary prevention at three months and one year after stroke and referral to physician if medical interventions are needed. Assessment of functional status and self-reports on health outcome. Supportive counselling provided.
Patients' self-reports on Mobility, Self Care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression, Health Outcome were registered. Health problems were assessed. Secondary prevention was controlled by measuring blood pressure, Cholesterol levels, HbA1c, Weight to estimate nutritional status. Functional status was assessed. Supportive counselling was provided. Referral was sent to physician if medical interventions were needed.
Other: Control group
Standard care with no outlined follow-up until one year after stroke. Control of secondary prevention after one year after stroke and referral to physician if medical interventions are needed. Follow-up one year after stroke according to the same protocol as the intervention group.
No intervention three months after stroke. Assessment one year after stroke and comparison with the intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk factors and health outcome compared between intervention group and control group
Time Frame: Baseline to one year after stroke for both groups.
Outcome for both groups after one year was measured as the proportion of risk factors sufficiently treated, the patients' self-reports on health outcome and comparison between the intervention group and the control group.
Baseline to one year after stroke for both groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk factors and health outcome at two follow-ups.
Time Frame: Baseline to one year after stroke
Comparison of health outcome at three months and one year after stroke in the intervention group.
Baseline to one year after stroke

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann-Cathrin Jönsson, PhD, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MaStrokeFup0809
  • UMASNL (Other Identifier: Regional Ethical Review Board DNr 520/2007)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Secondary prevention, supportive counselling

3
Subscribe