Safety and Efficacy Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO) in Non-Catheterizing Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

April 17, 2019 updated by: Allergan
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to NDO in non-catheterizing patients with MS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liege, Belgium
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
      • Olomouc, Czechia
      • Garches, France
      • Marseille, France
      • Warsaw, Poland
      • Porto, Portugal
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
    • Washington
      • Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 3 episodes of urinary incontinence over a 3-day period
  • History of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
  • Urinary incontinence not adequately controlled by anticholinergic medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of intermittent catheter or indwelling catheter to manage urinary incontinence
  • Previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition
  • Previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any non-urological condition within the last 12 weeks
  • Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert Syndrome, or Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OnabotulinumtoxinA
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U is administered into the detrusor at Day 1. After a minimum of 12 weeks, patients could request/qualify for a second onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U injection.
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U is administered into the detrusor at Day 1 in the onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U arm. After a minimum of 12 weeks, patients in both the onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U arm and the placebo arm could request/qualify for an onabotulinumtoxinA injection.
Other Names:
  • BOTOX®
  • botulinum toxin Type A
Other: Placebo (Normal Saline)
Placebo (normal saline) is administered into the detrusor at Day 1. After a minimum of 12 weeks, patients could request/qualify for an onabotulinumtoxinA injection.
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U is administered into the detrusor at Day 1 in the onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U arm. After a minimum of 12 weeks, patients in both the onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U arm and the placebo arm could request/qualify for an onabotulinumtoxinA injection.
Other Names:
  • BOTOX®
  • botulinum toxin Type A
Placebo (normal saline) is administered into the detrusor at Day 1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Frequency of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary. The number of episodes of urinary incontinence is recorded over a 3-day period the week of the study visit. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change indicates an increase in incontinence episodes (worsening).
Baseline, Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
MCC represents the maximum volume of urine the bladder holds. A positive number change from baseline represents an improvement (increase) in the maximum volume of urine the bladder holds and a negative number change from baseline represents a worsening (decrease) in the maximum volume of urine the bladder holds.
Baseline, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Maximum detrusor pressure represents the maximum pressure (peak amplitude) in the bladder during the first involuntary contraction of the bladder muscle. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement in pressure and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening in pressure.
Baseline, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
The I-QOL is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL, and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0=worst QOL and 100=best QOL). A positive change from baseline represents an improvement and a negative change from baseline represents a worsening.
Baseline, Week 6

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Treatment Effect Through Week 52
Time Frame: Up to 52 Weeks
The duration of treatment effect is the time to patient request for retreatment.
Up to 52 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on OnabotulinumtoxinA

3
Subscribe