The Acute Effect of a Mobilization With Movement Technique to Improve Internal Rotation of the Shoulder

September 1, 2015 updated by: Renato Rozenblit Soliaman, Federal University of São Paulo

Principal Investigator

For many years researchers have been documented that the shoulder of the throwing athlete acquires a increase in external rotation of the dominant limb compared to the contralateral side.This fact is followed with a loss of the internal rotation of the shoulder, which is related with a higher rate of injuries in this joint and it´s known as Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit (GIRD).

Among the approaches for this condition the literature is inconclusive due to the low methodological quality of clinical trials made,however, the manual therapy has been used with success to relief the pain and restore the range of motion.

The purpose of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of a mobilization with movement technique to improve the internal rotation of the shoulder in throwing athletes with GIRD.

It will be a randomized controlled trial with the CONSORT bases with 40 participants that will be divided into two groups:

  • Control group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation)of both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up (five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention.
  • Mobilization group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation)of both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up(five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) plus a mobilization with movement technique to improve internal rotation of the dominant shoulder (three sets of 10 repetitions)and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention.

To evaluate the range of movement it will be use a standard goniometer with an attached customizes bubble inclinometer to ensure proper perpendicular alignment of the goniometer to the ground.

The investigators hypothesis is that both group will have improvements in the internal rotation of the dominant shoulder, however, the mobilization group will have a statistically significant difference compared to control group immediately post-intervention. Four weeks post-intervention this difference will equalize, because of the only intervention applied.

Results will be expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with their respective confidence intervals at 95% and adopting α = 0.05. All analyzes will be performed by SPSS version 17.0

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 04039-001
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Athletes that practice at least 10 hours of throwing sports.
  • Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits of the dominant shoulder compare to the non-dominant limb.
  • Agree to participate and signing the informed consent approved for the Federal University of São Paulo ethics committee.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgeries of the shoulders.
  • Unable to perform the evaluation or treatment due to pain.
  • Performing physical therapy treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Control group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation)for both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up (five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention.
Other Names:
  • Control group
Experimental: Mobilization Group
Mobilization group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation) for both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up (five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) plus a mobilization with movement to improve internal rotation of the dominant shoulder (three sets of 10 repetitions)and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention.
Other Names:
  • Experimental Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analyse the effectiveness of a mobilization with movement technique to improve internal rotation of the shoulder in throwers athletes with GIRD
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention
The 40 patients will be divided in two groups of 20. Both will perform a evaluation of the internal and external rotation of the shoulders to determine the individual internal rotation deficit of the dominant shoulder compared to the contralateral side. One group (Control) will perform what the literature recommends (Stretch of the posterior capsule), and the other group (Mobilization) will add to the control intervention a mobilization with movement technique to improve the internal rotation deficit which was identified previously.
Immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renato R Soliaman, Centro de Traumatologia do Esporte - CETE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contracture

Clinical Trials on Posterior capsule stretching

Subscribe