Plating of Distal Femur Fractures by Far Cortical Locking Using MotionLoc Screws

January 28, 2013 updated by: Michael Bottlang, PhD, Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory

MotionLoc Study: Healing of Distal Femur Fractures Stabilized With a Flexible Plating Construct Using MotionLoc Screws

The objective of this study is to document callus formation and healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates utilizing modern MotionLoc screws that provide controlled axial micro-motion to actively promote fracture healing.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Rigid locked plating constructs can suppress fracture healing, particularly at the near cortex adjacent to the plate where interfragmentary motion is minimal. Dynamic fixation with Far Cortical Locking (FCL) screws reduces construct stiffness and induces axial interfragmentary motion to stimulate symmetric callus formation and healing. Two versions of FCL screws are commercially available, but the clinical durability of this novel concept has not been documented to date. This prospective observational study documented our early clinical experience with MotionLoc® FCL screws for stabilization of distal femur fractures to assess their durability and potential complications.

Thirty-two consecutive patients with 33 distal femur fractures (AO/OTA types 33-A and 33-C) were prospectively enrolled at three trauma centers. Fractures were stabilized by plate osteosynthesis with MotionLoc® FCL screws without supplemental bone graft or bone morphogenic proteins. Thirty patients with 31 fractures were available for follow-up until union or revision. Follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 weeks comprised functional and radiographic assessment of implant fixation and fracture healing, including computed tomography scans at week 12. The primary endpoint was fracture healing in absence of complications and revision.

There was no incidence of implant breakage or diaphyseal fixation failure. Thirty of 31 fractures healed within 15.6 ± 6.2 weeks, as evident by bridging callus and pain-free load bearing. There were two revisions, one at 5 days post surgery to correct a mal-rotation, and one at 6 months post surgery to revise a non-union. Periosteal callus distribution at week 6 was symmetrical, with similar amounts of callus at the medial cortex (35%) anterior cortex (30%) and posterior cortex (35%). In 23 fractures (74%), callus formation extended to the lateral cortex under the plate.

Absence of hardware and fixation failure suggests that dynamic plating of distal femur fractures with FCL screws provides safe and effective fixation. Moreover, the amount and symmetric distribution of periosteal callus suggests that dynamic fixation with FCL screws may promote increased fracture healing over standard locked plating. However, this hypothesis on the stimulatory effect of dynamic fixation on fracture healing requires investigation in a future randomized control trial.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97232
        • Legacy Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Distal femur fractures (AO/OTA Type 33A and 33C)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with distal femur fracture (AO/OTA Type 33A and 33C)
  2. Patients 17 years of age and over.
  3. Patients able to be operated on by selected surgeons at the participating centers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Patients who are enrolled in an investigational treatment trial.
  3. Patients who are not expected to survive the follow-up period.
  4. Considered an inappropriate participant by the study physician.
  5. Revision surgery
  6. Patients currently incarcerated or awaiting incarceration.
  7. Severe spinal injury with neurological deficit resulting in paralysis.
  8. Fracture fixed more then 28 days after injury.
  9. Acute or chronic local or systemic infections
  10. Periprosthetic fractures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Femur Fractures
Patients with Distal Femur Fractures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture Healing
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 weeks post surgery
Fracture healing is defined clinically by the ability of pain-free weight bearing, and radiographically by callus formation and bridging.
6, 12, and 24 weeks post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periosteal Callus Size
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks post surgery
Periosteal callus size is assessed at the anterior, posterior, and medial aspects on radiographs using a validated computational algorithm.
6, 12, 24 weeks post surgery
Bridging Callus from CT
Time Frame: 12 weeks post surgery
Cross-sectional image analysis, supported by 3-D rendering, to detect bony bridging at the anterior, posterior, and lateral aspects of the femur.
12 weeks post surgery
Fixation Failure
Time Frame: 24 weeks post surgery
Assessed in terms of loss of alignment at 12 and 24 weeks post surgery
24 weeks post surgery
Hardware failure
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks post surgery
Breakage of screw or plate
6, 12, 24 weeks post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Bottlang, PhD, Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory
  • Study Chair: Steven Madey, MD, Legacy Health System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture of Distal Femur

Subscribe