Combined NMES,FEES and Traditional Swallowing Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Stroke-related Dysphagia

November 18, 2012 updated by: Shu-Fen Sun, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) With Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Traditional Swallowing Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Stroke-related Dysphagia

The investigators aimed to evaluate effects of combined NMES, FEES and traditional swallowing rehabilitation in stroke patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)and Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are both promising approaches to enhance swallowing recovery for dysphagic patients. However, there is no literature on the effectiveness of combined application of these modalities in the treatment of patients with poststroke dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate whether combined NMES, FEES and traditional swallowing rehabilitation can improve swallowing functions in patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia after stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813
        • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 20-85 years old
  • first-time stroke confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance image
  • dysphagia > 3 weeks, with preservation of the swallowing reflex
  • currently on a restricted diet, with a Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score of 5 or less
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)> 21
  • no obvious mental depression, receptive aphasia or cognitive impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • progressive cerebrovascular disease or other neurologic diseases
  • unstable cardiopulmonary status, serious psychologic disorder or epilepsy;
  • tumors, extensive surgery or radiotherapy of the head and neck region
  • cardiac pacemakers
  • swallowing therapy within 2 months before participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The combination group
Patients received 12 sessions of NMES for 1 hour /day, 5 days/week within a period of 2-3 weeks. FEES was done before and after NMES for evaluation and guiding therapy. All patients subsequently received 12 sessions of traditional swallowing rehabilitation (50 minutes/day, 3 days/week) for 4 weeks.
Patients received 12 sessions of NMES for 1 hour /day, 5 days/week within a period of 2-3 weeks. FEES was done before and after NMES for evaluation and guiding therapy. All patients subsequently received 12 sessions of traditional swallowing rehabilitation (50 minutes/day, 3 days/week) for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS)
Time Frame: at 6-month follow-up
The FOIS is a 7-point ordinal scale reflecting the dietary intake of patients with dysphagia. It has adequate reliability and validity and has been used extensively in clinical studies of dysphagia to measure functional oral intake
at 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree of dysphagia
Time Frame: at 6-month follow-up
The degree of dysphagia was classified from grade 1 to 4 after detailed clinical swallowing evaluation including cranial nerve assessment, observations of swallowing and related movements and swallowing trials using various volumes and consistencies of food
at 6-month follow-up
swallowing VAS
Time Frame: at 6-month follow-up
Each patient completed a perceptual evaluation of his swallowing ability using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). It was rated by answering a single question: ''How do you qualify your swallowing ability?'' Scores can vary from 0 (no difficulty at all) to 10 (unable to swallow).
at 6-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
global satisfaction to the combination therapy
Time Frame: at 6-month follow-up
Patients were asked to rate the level of global satisfaction to the combination therapy. The rating was based on a 7-point categorical scale weighted from completely satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, no change, somewhat unsatisfied, unsatisfied to completely unsatisfied.
at 6-month follow-up
The occurrence of adverse events or pneumonia
Time Frame: at 6-month follow-up
The occurrence of adverse events or pneumonia was recorded during the study period.
at 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shu-Fen Sun, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Chien-Wei Hsu, MD, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine; Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Huey-Shyan Lin, PHD, School of Nursing, Fooyin University, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on the combination group

3
Subscribe