Comparative Analysis of Large Macular Hole Surgeries (CAOLMHS)

Prospective, Consecutive, Non-randomized,Interventional Trial of Comparative Analysis of Large Macular Hole Surgeries

This study compares the anatomical and visual outcomes in a large series of patients affected by idiopathic macular holes larger than 400 µm treated using pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique. A part of the participants will receive internal limiting membrane peeling,whil the other will receive the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Vitrectomy is the standard treatment for idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) and is combined with removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to improve anatomical outcomes.However, surgical closure is not achieved after a single operation in all cases, and patients with long-standing MHs or highly myopic eyes are challenging to treat.Various surgical strategies have been introduced to improve postoperative outcomes for these cases. Michalewska et al. have reported an inverted ILM flap technique for large MHs. The ILM around the MH was left to cover or fill the hole and showed a better anatomical closure rate and visual outcome than ILM peeling for large MHs. Nevertheless, the functional and anatomic outcomes of the ILM flap technique have not been investigated as extensively as the ILM peeling technique and have yet to be confirmed by research comparing the ILM flap technique with the conventional procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • idiopathic MHs, a minimum hole diameter of ≥ 400 μm, and follow-up for at least 3 months after vitrectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High myopia (≥6 diopters,AL≥26.5mm), increased intraocular pressure (IOP, >21 mm Hg) or glaucoma, severe cataract, severe systemic conditions that prevent surgery, and history of ocular trauma, intraocular inflammation, retinal vascular disease, or previous ocular surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: the peeling group
the internal limiting membrane was discarded
the internal limiting membrane was discarded
Experimental: the Cover group
the internal limiting membrane was peeled centripetally all the way up to the MH rim and the hinged ILM flap folded upside-down on top of the MH in order to bridge the entire retinal defect with a single layer.
The internal limiting membrane around the MH was left to cover the hole
Experimental: the Fill group
the internal limiting membrane was folded in multiple layers and deliberately "stuffed" or "packed" within the MH defect using a forceps.
The internal limiting membrane around the MH was left to fill the hole

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MH status
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
MH status (open, flat open or closed)
at 3 months after surgery
IS/OS line interruption width
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
IS/OS line interruption width were gauged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
at 3 months after surgery
Change from Baseline IS/OS line interruption width at 3 months
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
IS/OS line interruption width were gauged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
at 3 months after surgery
Baseline best-corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
best-corrected visual acuity were gauged with EDTRS charts,recorded in decimals and was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units for statistical analysis
at 3 months after surgery
Change from Baseline best-corrected visual acuity at 3 months
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
best-corrected visual acuity were gauged with EDTRS charts,recorded in decimals and was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units for statistical analysis
at 3 months after surgery
visual function
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
visual function were gauged with national eye institute visual function questionnaire-25((NEI VFQ-25)
at 3 months after surgery
Change from Baseline visual function at 3 months
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
visual function were gauged with national eye institute visual function questionnaire-25((NEI VFQ-25)
at 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tao Jiang, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IR001094
  • 2019-142 (Other Identifier: 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Holes

Clinical Trials on the peeling group

3
Subscribe