Physical and Psychological Profiles Associated With Patient's Preference for ESRD Treatment

November 15, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Physical and Psychological Evaluation of Patients Reaching End Stage Renal Disease : Effects on the Choice of Renal Replacement Therapy

Highlighting the relationship between psychological and physical profiles and patient's preference to better understand the patient's treatment preference and improve the information provided.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

CKD is a Public Health Problem with a prevalence of 10% in general population. For patients reaching The making decision to treat ESRD with renal replacement therapy is a complex process and needs to be shared between patients, family, physician and nephrologist.

Systematic Information delivery about several treatments of ESRD is recommended for patients and his family (Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation and Conservative treatment). Some studies on the preference of patients for renal replacement therapy reported a choice for PD about 50% while the registers report a low diffusion of PD (around 10%). Since 2009 we propose a systematic information about the different therapeutic options for ESRD and identified some clinical characteristics associated to patient's preference. However we want to know if psychological or physical phenotype is associated to patient's preference.

The objective of the study is to highlight the relationship between psychological and physical profiles and patient's preference to better understand the patient's treatment preference and improve the information provided.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • CHU de Nice - Service de Néphrologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • More than 18 years
  • CKD with estimated GFR below 20 ml/min/1.73m2 without dialysis treatment
  • Patient who accepts information delivery about treatments of ESRF
  • Patient who accepted and signed the informed consent
  • Subject beneficiary of a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to achieve psychological tests
  • Inability to achieve physical tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: single arm
Evaluation of psychological phenotype with several questionnaire (Big Five, EPADV-16), physical activity with a self-administered questionnaire (Baecke) and several test ( SPPB, Handgrip Strengh test, MicroFET 2 Digital Dynamometer)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of different psychological and physical characteristics according to patients preference
Time Frame: one day

The measure is composite:

criteria evaluated for psychological phenotype are: The score of the Big Five test Scale Assess people's perception of autonomy in various life domains (EPADV-16)

The criteria evaluated for physical phenotype are:

  • Global physical activity assess with self-administered questionnaire of BAECKE.
  • Evaluation of mobility with Short Physical Performance Battery Score (SPPB)
  • Measure of the maximum isometric strenght of the hand with " Handgrip Strengh test"
  • Assessment of musculoskeletal testing of the leg with MicroFET 2 Digital Dynamometer
one day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical characteristics and laboratory values
Time Frame: one day
Clinical characteristics (age, sex, way of life, education level, QOL, nephropathy, cardio-vascular comorbidity) and laboratory values (haemoglobin, ferritin, css, creatinine, cystatin C, phosphates, calcium, 25OHD3, PTH and CRP) associated with psychological or physical phenotypes.
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier MORANNE, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

April 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Failure

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of psychological phenotype

3
Subscribe