- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01850914
Vascular Risk Factors in INPH-patients
May 27, 2013 updated by: Hanna Israelsson, Umeå University
Vascular Risk Factors, Subclinical and Manifest Vascular Disease in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a treatable and a common disease of the elderly.
The overall objective of this work is to describe cardio- and cerebrovascular risk factors and vascular disease in shunted INPH-patients compared to an age- and sex matched elderly population, as well as the impact of vascular risk factors and vascular co-morbidity on clinical symptoms and outcome of surgery in INPH-patients.
The hypothesis is that INPH-patients have a higher level of vascular risk factors and subclinical organ damage than a normal elderly population, and that the higher the level of existing vascular risk factors, the more severe the symptoms of the hydrocephalic disease.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
860
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Västerbotten
-
Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden, 901 87
- Umeå University, Umeå University Hospital, Departement of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
60 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Cases are all INPH-patients who underwent surgery 2008-2010 and are registered in the Swedish National Register of Hydrocephalus.
Controls were found in the Swedish population indox of Umeå, and were indivdually matched to cases according to age and sex.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- INPH-patients who underwent surgery 2008-2010 and registered in the Swedish National Register of Hydrocephalus
- age <60 and >85
- (only for controls) living in Umeå
Exclusion Criteria:
- death
- a known mini mental state estimation <23
- inability to communicate (because of severe stroke, aphasia, dementia)
- (only for controls) individuals with INPH who has not yet underwent surgery, or has not been chosen to undergo surgery.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Shunted patients with INPH
Cases: Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus who have underwent surgery.
Controls: Sex- and age-matched community based controls.
|
Populationbased elderly.
A group of populationbased elderly, matched according to age and sex to the patients with INPH.
Vascular risk factors studied.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Differences in bloodpressure between INPH-patients and a sex- and agematched community based population
Time Frame: More than two weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than two weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Quality of Life in INPH-patients compared to a sex- and age-matched population.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding smoking.
Time Frame: More than two weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than two weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding waist-to-hip ratio.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding dietary risk score.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not more than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not more than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding physical activity.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding diabetes mellitus.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding alcohol intake.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding psychosocial factors.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding cardiac causes.
Time Frame: More than two weeks, not longer than 6 weeks.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than two weeks, not longer than 6 weeks.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding ratio of apolipoprotein B to A1.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding activities of daily life (ADL).
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding frequency, severity and fear of falling.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding headache.
Time Frame: More than2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding epilepsy.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Differences between INPH-patients and community based controls regarding kidney function.
Time Frame: More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Enrollment of participants 2010-2012.
First, all participants complete a questionnaire, second they go to their local health care center or nearby hospital for measurements and blood samples.
The visit at the health care center/hospital is within a couple of months.
Participants are not followed further (cross-sectional study).
Analyses performed 2013-2014.
First results approximately reported in the end of 2013.
|
More than 2 weeks, not longer than 6 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Jan Malm, MD, PhD, Umeå University, Departement of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience
- Principal Investigator: Hanna Israelsson, MD, PhD-stud, Umeå University, Departement of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2012
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 7, 2013
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 10, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 29, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 27, 2013
Last Verified
May 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-52-31M
- Dnr 2011-52-31M (OTHER: Regional Ethics Board in Umeå)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Vascular Diseases
-
Terumo Europe N.V.CompletedPeripheral Vascular Disease | Hemostasis | Vascular Closure | Endovascular ProcedureBelgium, France, Germany
-
Alvotech Swiss AGActive, not recruitingChorioretinal Vascular DiseaseGeorgia
-
University Hospital, MontpellierTerminated
-
AmgenCompletedChorioretinal Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Duke UniversityTerminatedRetinal Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineUniversity of Oklahoma; US Department of Veterans Affairs; C. R. Bard; Long Beach...CompletedPeripheral Vascular Disease | Cardiac Catheterization | Vascular Access ComplicationsUnited States
-
Baylor UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingArterial Occlusive Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Disease | Atherosclerosis | Vascular Diseases, PeripheralUnited States
-
C. R. BardCromsourceCompletedVascular Diseases, PeripheralGermany, Poland
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedChorioretinal Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Terumo Europe N.V.Terumo Medical CorporationRecruitingPeripheral Vascular Disease | Hemostasis | Vascular Closure | Femoral Artery | Endovascular ProcedureFrance, Germany, Netherlands