Assessing the Team SA Instrument in Measuring the Effectiveness of Communication Across Disciplines During ICU Rounds

September 15, 2014 updated by: Naeem Ali, MD

Assessing the Utility of the Team SA Instrument in Measuring the Effectiveness of Communication Across Disciplines During ICU Rounds

Assessing the utility of the Team SA instrument in measuring the effectiveness of communication across disciplines during ICU rounds.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Multidisciplinary rounds are events that occur daily in Intensive care units. During these events, practitioners from multiple disciplines meet at a pre-specified time to discuss current medical condition and plans of care. At the conclusion of these discussions, all practitioners are expected to understand the plan of care well enough to execute defined tasks, but also coordinate as circumstances change. In order to coordinate under changing circumstances practitioners must have a broader understanding of the current state of the patient and how likely certain deteriorations are. This synthetic understanding of patient risks across multi-provider groups has been described as anticipatory team situational awareness (Team SA). One instrument has been validated in the ICU as feasible and informative. This Team SA survey successfully identified that the time spent in "training" discussions improved Team SA across physician groups. The investigators' goal is to implement this survey across the investigators' medical ICU service to obtain a baseline estimate of how effective current communication patterns are for achieving concordant Team SA. If gaps in communication are encountered future interventions will be developed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute 473 w. 12TH aVE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Daily census rosters of the MICU and 8ICU nursing units will be reviewed for occupancy. At 8am on survey days occupied beds will be tallied (up to 39 beds). Beds occupied by a non-MICU service patient and those with active DNR-CC orders will be excluded. From the remaining patients, ten bed numbers will be randomly selected for review. Randomization will be stratified by MICU service sub-unit (MICU 40, MICU 90, 8ICU). If fewer than ten patients are eligible on an assigned survey day, all patients in the ICU on that day will be surveyed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses, primary clinicians (resident or NP) and Critical Care physicians (Staff or Fellow in Critical Care Medicine) will be approached for interview. All subjects will be approached individually and asked to participate outside of the presence of the other potential study subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine if it is feasible to survey clinicians regarding their opinions about future risks for individual patients in the ICU setting To determine the range of team situational awareness exhibited by current ICU clinician teams
Time Frame: It is expected that a maximum of ten minutes will be required to complete the survey.
It is expected that a maximum of ten minutes will be required to complete the survey.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naeem Ali, MD, Ohio State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012B0233

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Personal Communication

Subscribe