Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of Dupilumab for Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

March 5, 2020 updated by: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, Serum Concentration and Biomarker Profile of Dupilumab Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The primary objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of Dupilumab, compared to placebo, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female, 18 years or older;
  2. Chronic AD that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit;
  3. Patients with documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to out-patient treatment with topical medications, or for whom topical treatments were otherwise inadvisable;
  4. Willing and able to comply with all clinic visits and study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior participation in a Dupilumab clinical trial;
  2. Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives before the baseline visit;
  3. The following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, will likely require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:

    • Systemic corticosteroids;
    • Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs;
    • Phototherapy for AD;
  4. Treatment with topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus and/or pimecrolimus within 1 week before the baseline visit;
  5. Treatment with certain biologics;
  6. Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks before the baseline visit;
  7. Planned major surgical procedure during the participant's participation in this study;
  8. Participant was a member of the investigational team or his/her immediate family;
  9. Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit
  10. Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study;

Note: The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/exclusion criteria are listed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Placebo qw
Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection once weekly (qw) from Week 1 to Week 15.
Matching placebo
Participants were required to apply stable doses of a topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily for at least 7 days before the baseline visit and at least 7 days after the baseline visit (day -7 to day 8).
Other Names:
  • Topical emollient
EXPERIMENTAL: Dupilumab 200 mg qw
Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 milligram (mg) (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 200 mg injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15.
Other Names:
  • Dupixent
  • REGN668
  • SAR231893
Participants were required to apply stable doses of a topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily for at least 7 days before the baseline visit and at least 7 days after the baseline visit (day -7 to day 8).
Other Names:
  • Topical emollient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area Severity Index Score (EASI) to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema (E), infiltration (I), excoriation (Ex) and lichenification (L) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Baseline to Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue medication were set to missing and participants with missing IGA score at Week 16 were considered as non-responders.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Participants with reduction in IGA score from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 were reported. Values after first rescue medication were set to missing and participants with missing IGA score at Week 16 were treated as non-responders.
Baseline to Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in EASI Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranged from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 50%, 75% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score ( EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90 Respectively) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 responders were the participants who achieved ≥50%, ≥75% and ≥90% respectively, overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 50%, 75% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Score (SCORAD-50, SCORAD-75 and SCORAD-90 Respectively) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
SCORAD was a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23-31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) were assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). SCORAD-50, SCORAD-75 and SCORAD-90 responders were the participants who achieved ≥50%, ≥75% and ≥90% respectively, overall improvement in SCORAD score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing SCORAD score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Baseline to Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Participant's Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) Components (Erythema, Infiltration/Papulation, Excoriations, and Lichenification) to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16
Changes From Baseline in GISS Cumulative Score to Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease).Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Baseline to Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe