A Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients Undergoing PCI With CYP2C19 Loss-of-function:

August 27, 2020 updated by: University of Florida

A Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI With CYP2C19 Loss-of-function Genotypes: A Feasibility Study With Point-of-care Pharmacodynamic and Genetic Testing

Numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability, including genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clopidogrel is the most broadly utilized platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability. Among these, genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme, a key contributor to clopidogrel metabolism, have been involved. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because of these findings, drug regulating authorities have provided a boxed warning on the product label of clopidogrel on the potential for reduced efficacy of clopidogrel among CYP2C19 LOF carriers and suggested considering alternative antiplatelet therapies for these individuals. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy according to results of genetic testing has been limited in real world clinical practice because of not having readily accessible results of individual's genetic makeup. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • Inclusion criteria:

    1. Patients scheduled for left heart catheterization and undergoing PCI
    2. Age 18-75 years
    3. On aspirin (81mg) or aspirin (81mg) and clopidogrel (75mg/day)
    4. Presence of at least one 2C19 LOF allele
  • Exclusion criteria:

    1. Known allergies to aspirin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or clopidogrel
    2. Age >75 years
    3. Weight <60kg
    4. Considered at high risk for bleeding
    5. History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack
    6. Known severe hepatic dysfunction
    7. On treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy (Vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban)
    8. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban)
    9. Blood dyscrasia or bleeding diathesis
    10. Platelet count <80x106/mL
    11. Hemoglobin <10 g/dL.
    12. Active bleeding or hemodynamic instability
    13. Creatinine Clearance <30 mL/minute
    14. Patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high degree AV block without pacemaker protection.
    15. Current treatment with drugs interfering with CYP3A4 metabolism (to avoid interaction with Ticagrelor): Ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, and telithromizycin.
    16. Pregnant females* *Women of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives) while participating in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ticagrelor
The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers.
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor
Other Names:
  • Effient
Experimental: Prasugrel
The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers.
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor
Other Names:
  • Brilinta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Platelet Reactivity
Time Frame: 24 hours post loading dose
The primary endpoint is P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) measured by the Verify Now P2Y12 assay 24hours/hospital discharge post randomization to prasugrel vs ticagrelor. PRU is is an arbitrary unit of measure to assess ADP-induced platelet aggregation.
24 hours post loading dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Prasugrel

3
Subscribe